EGU26-5123, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5123
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Friday, 08 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Friday, 08 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5, X5.212
A regime change in Arctic sea ice growth
Benjamin Mellor1, Michel Tsamados1, and Harry Heorton2
Benjamin Mellor et al.
  • 1University College London , Dept of Earth Sciences, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (ucfabrm@ucl.ac.uk)
  • 2University College London , Dept of Geography, United Kingdom of Great Britain

The decline in Arctic sea ice thickness (SIT) is a key indicator response of the cryosphere to anthropogenic climate change. While the drivers of this decline are debated, they involve a competition between the ice-albedo positive feedback that enhances ocean heat content and the thin-ice negative feedback enhancing ice speed and alters dynamic-thermodynamic interactions. To date, pan-Arctic assessments of the dynamic and thermodynamic responses have been limited to the CryoSat-2 era (2010–Present Day).

Here we apply recently developed thickness products to produce novel 30-year records of Arctic sea ice volume (SIV) budget, resolving dynamic and thermodynamic terms. Our residual growth is validated on IMB buoy data and has a slight positive bias of +0.14 m-1 and a strong seasonal cycle. We identify a step change increase of 1,300 km-3 in thermodynamic growth, coincident with the pause in volume decline of the winter of 2007/08, representing a regime change in system behaviour where 76\% of seasonal growth is explained by the mean thickness of the surviving sea ice (p<0.001). Furthermore, enhancement in growth is regionalised and strongly correlates with sea ice drift modes. Specifically, we find that cyclonic atmospheric circulation modes associated with a negative Arctic Oscillation promote a dynamically coupled thin-ice feedback by enhancing thermodynamic growth through divergence and advection of SIV. This effect is observed throughout the periphery seas and is variable on inter-annual and decadal timescales. Finally, we investigate the contribution of thickness, concentration and drift to budget term variance. Finding that 87% of volume flux variance is accounted for by SIT anomaly. We highlight the utility of volume budgeting for identifying unphysical spatio-temporal patterns in SIT datasets and provide a new long-term benchmark for constraining sea ice growth in climate model assessments.

How to cite: Mellor, B., Tsamados, M., and Heorton, H.: A regime change in Arctic sea ice growth, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-5123, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5123, 2026.