EGU26-5198, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5198
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 08 May, 10:55–11:05 (CEST)
 
Room M2
Monitoring urban atmospheric CO2 plumes from space: sensitivity to urban physics and scale effects over Paris
Alohotsy Rafalimanana1, Thomas Lauvaux1,3, Charbel Abdallah1, Mali Chariot2,3, Michel Ramonet3, Josselin Doc3, Olivier Laurent3, Morgan Lopez3, Anja Raznjevic4, Maarten Krol4, Leena Järvi5, Leslie David6, Olivier Sanchez6, Andreas Christen7, Dana Looschelders7, Laura Bignotti8, Benjamin Loubet8, Sue Grimmond9, and William Morrison10
Alohotsy Rafalimanana et al.
  • 1Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France (alohotsy.rafalimanana@univ-reims.fr)
  • 2Origins.earth, Reims, France
  • 3Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE), IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France
  • 4Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands
  • 5Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) / Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • 6Airparif, Paris, France
  • 7Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany
  • 8Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), Fance
  • 9University of Reading
  • 10School of GeoSciences University of Edinburgh

Quantifying urban CO2 emissions from space can be approached using different methodologies, including direct plume-based analyses, but combining satellite observations with atmospheric transport models requires the ability to realistically reproduce fine-scale spatial gradients over cities. Using the Grand Paris area as a testbed, we investigate the sensitivity of simulated near-surface CO2 concentrations to urban physics parameterization and horizontal resolution within the WRF-Chem modeling framework coupled to a high-resolution fossil fuel emission inventory. At mesoscale resolution (900 m), a hierarchy of urban representations ranging from simulations without urban physics to multi-layer urban canopy models is evaluated, showing that the Building Energy Model (BEM) provides the most physically consistent simulation of surface energy fluxes, boundary-layer development, and near-surface CO2 variability. Building on this configuration, we compare mesoscale simulations with Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) runs at 300 m and 100 m resolution. Model results are evaluated against dense urban CO2 observations from the high-precision Picarro network, a complementary mid-cost sensor network from ICOS-Cities, and surface sensible and latent heat flux observations from the ICOS ETC Level-2 fluxes data product. An extensive urban observation network including wind lidars and ceilometers from Urbisphere project provides an exceptional constraint for the evaluation of boundary-layer structure and vertical mixing at fine scales. The LES simulations substantially enhance the representation of spatial heterogeneity and localized CO2 enhancements associated with major emission sources, which are smoothed or underestimated at mesoscale resolution. However, increased resolution also amplifies sensitivity to local wind fields and emission inventory uncertainties. These results highlight that both urban physics and model resolution critically shape the ability of transport models to reproduce observed urban CO2 gradients.

How to cite: Rafalimanana, A., Lauvaux, T., Abdallah, C., Chariot, M., Ramonet, M., Doc, J., Laurent, O., Lopez, M., Raznjevic, A., Krol, M., Järvi, L., David, L., Sanchez, O., Christen, A., Looschelders, D., Bignotti, L., Loubet, B., Grimmond, S., and Morrison, W.: Monitoring urban atmospheric CO2 plumes from space: sensitivity to urban physics and scale effects over Paris, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-5198, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5198, 2026.