EGU26-5407, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5407
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 06 May, 14:05–14:25 (CEST)
 
Room 2.15
From Rain to Runoff: Unraveling Hidden Subsurface Flowpaths in Hillslopes
Jonas Pyschik1,2, Alexey Kuleshov3, Emanuel Thoenes4, Christina Fasching5, Stefan Achleitner4, Luisa Hopp3, Bernhard Kohl6, and Markus Weiler1
Jonas Pyschik et al.
  • 1Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Near-Surface Geophysics, Freiburg, Germany (science@jonas-pyschik.com)
  • 2Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Hydrology, Freiburg, Germany
  • 3University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
  • 4Unit of Hydraulic Engineering, University of Innsbruck, Austria
  • 5University of Marburg, Department of Geography, Marburg, Germany
  • 6Austrian Research Centre for Forests (BFW), Innsbruck, Austria

Subsurface stormflow (SSF) can be a significant runoff mechanism in many headwater catchments, accounting for up to 90% of streamflow during rainfall-runoff events. Despite its hydrological significance, the processes controlling SSF are not yet fully understood. In order to investigate SSF dynamics and flowpath behavior in more detail, we conducted several field experiments including artificial rainfall simulations with deuterium-labelled water, monitored SSF response of artificial and natural rainfall events and performed soil core isotope profiling on a forested hillslope in a Black Forest catchment.

A dual-layer trench system captured SSF in two soil depth layers during experimental and natural events. Labelled rainfall water infiltrated to depths of over 1 m within minutes; however, isotope profiles revealed that the labelled water was largely confined to the top 20 cm of the soil matrix, indicating rapid bypass flow via deep preferential pathways. While only ~10% of the applied labelled water was recovered as SSF outflow, ~45% remained in the topsoil. SSF outflow was dominated by pre-event water, suggesting displacement via piston flow due to infiltrating labelled water, supporting a dual-domain conceptual model. During natural rainfall, the ratio of pre-event to event water varied with antecedent soil moisture, indicating that the storage–remobilization behavior was modulated by initial wetness conditions — wetter soils remobilized stored pre-event water more effectively. Additionally, event water volumes scaled linearly with precipitation inputs, indicating that larger storms activate more flowpaths and/or increase transport velocities.

These results highlight the complexity and spatial heterogeneity of subsurface flow paths in hillslopes. They emphasize the importance of high-resolution monitoring and targeted experiments in improving our understanding and representations of SSF dynamics in catchment-scale models, particularly with regard to solute transport and runoff generation.

How to cite: Pyschik, J., Kuleshov, A., Thoenes, E., Fasching, C., Achleitner, S., Hopp, L., Kohl, B., and Weiler, M.: From Rain to Runoff: Unraveling Hidden Subsurface Flowpaths in Hillslopes, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-5407, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5407, 2026.