EGU26-5833, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5833
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–14:20 (CEST)
 
Room N2
Prioritization of risk reduction strategies by multi-criteria decision analysis: a multi-hazard approach
Daniela Molinari1, Panagiotis Asaridis1, Annarita Balingit2, Maria Pia Boni1, Luca Cetara3, Paola Fontanella Pisa4,8, Filippo Fraschini5, Alice Gallazzi1, Simona Muratori6, Malvina Ongaro1, Daria Ottonelli5, Gloria Padovan2, Federica Romagnoli4, and Francesca Vigotti7
Daniela Molinari et al.
  • 1Politecnico di Milano, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Milan, Italy
  • 2University of Florence, Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, Florence, Italy
  • 3Eurac Research, Representing Office Roma, Rome, Italy
  • 4Eurac Research, Center for Global Mountain Safeguard Research, Bolzano, Italy
  • 5CIMA Research Foundation, Savona, Italy
  • 6Poliedra - Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
  • 7Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Milan, Italy
  • 8Global Mountain Safeguard Research Program, United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security, Bolzano, Italy

Effective risk management in multi-hazard contexts represents a key focus of the Italian RETURN project (Multi-risk science for resilient communities under a changing climate). Within this framework, a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach has been developed to support the prioritization of risk reduction strategies. The proposed framework integrates three complementary dimensions of the problem at stake: (i) the optimization of risk reduction in complex multi-hazard settings, accounting for all relevant dimensions of risk (i.e., impacts on individual well-being, the built environment, public services, the natural environment, communities, business activities, and the financial system); (ii) the assessment of the economic, social, and environmental sustainability of proposed actions under current and future climate change conditions; and (iii) the systematic integration of stakeholders’ values, preferences, and objectives into the decision-making process. To achieve these goals, the framework combines multiple methodologies, including multi-hazard impact modelling for the definition of ex-ante and ex-post risk scenarios, expert-based assessments to evaluate long-term sustainability, and participatory processes to ensure effective stakeholder engagement. The MCDA framework provides a valuable decision-support tool for informed, transparent, and inclusive decision-making, aligned with efforts to enhance community resilience and sustainability, and is particularly relevant for policymakers, practitioners, and civil protection agencies.

How to cite: Molinari, D., Asaridis, P., Balingit, A., Boni, M. P., Cetara, L., Fontanella Pisa, P., Fraschini, F., Gallazzi, A., Muratori, S., Ongaro, M., Ottonelli, D., Padovan, G., Romagnoli, F., and Vigotti, F.: Prioritization of risk reduction strategies by multi-criteria decision analysis: a multi-hazard approach, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-5833, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5833, 2026.