EGU26-5870, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5870
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 04 May, 14:21–14:24 (CEST)
 
vPoster spot 4
Poster | Monday, 04 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Monday, 04 May, 14:00–18:00
 
vPoster Discussion, vP.50
Juno Constraints on Io’s Interior: Tidal Response and Melt Stability
Matteo Paris1,2, Alessandro Mura1, Francesca Zambon1, Antonio Genova3, Federico Tosi1, Giuseppe Piccioni1, Anastasia Consorzi4, Giuseppe Mitri4, Roberto Sordini1, Raffaella Noschese1, Andrea Cicchetti1, Christina Plainaki1, Scott Bolton5, and Giuseppe Sindoni6
Matteo Paris et al.
  • 1INAF, IAPS, Roma, Italy (matteo.paris@inaf.it)
  • 2Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy (matteo.paris@uniroma1.it)
  • 3Dipartimento di Meccanica e Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
  • 4Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Geologia, Università d’Annunzio, Pescara, Italy
  • 5Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA
  • 6Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, Roma, Italy

Jupiter’s moon Io is the most volcanically active body in the Solar System, powered by intense internal heating due to tidal dissipation. Although tidal friction is widely accepted as the main energy source, how this heat is distributed within Io and how it shapes the moon’s internal structure remain open questions. In this study, we use Io’s tidal response, quantified through the degree-2 Love number (k2), to constrain its interior, using recent estimates derived from Juno observations (Park et al., 2025).

We model Io with a three-layer structure consisting of a fluid core, a viscoelastic mantle, and a crust, using an adapted version of the California Planetary Geophysics Code (CPGC). Tidal dissipation is self-consistently coupled to mantle rheology through an Andrade model, with viscosity and shear modulus updated as functions of the local melt fraction. We explore two end-member scenarios that differ in the treatment of the Andrade parameter β: in the first, β is held constant, representing a uniform dissipation regime dominated by deep-mantle heating; in the second, β varies with depth, allowing dissipation to be preferentially localized in the upper mantle. In both scenarios, viscosity and shear modulus evolve with melt fraction.

Our results identify several partially molten mantle configurations whose real part of k2 is consistent with Juno constraints. In all acceptable models, melt fractions remain below the threshold required to form a global magma layer. To test the physical viability of these states, we compare thermodynamic melt production with the capacity for melt migration. We find that melt transport is efficient enough to prevent long-term melt accumulation, favoring a stable, partially molten “magma sponge” rather than a global magma ocean. These results provide new constraints on Io’s thermal state and are consistent with independent estimates of its global volcanic output.

How to cite: Paris, M., Mura, A., Zambon, F., Genova, A., Tosi, F., Piccioni, G., Consorzi, A., Mitri, G., Sordini, R., Noschese, R., Cicchetti, A., Plainaki, C., Bolton, S., and Sindoni, G.: Juno Constraints on Io’s Interior: Tidal Response and Melt Stability, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-5870, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5870, 2026.