EGU26-5938, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5938
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 04 May, 08:55–09:05 (CEST)
 
Room -2.31
Advancing community workflows, interdisciplinary collaboration, communication, and trust in field based geologic data systems
Basil Tikoff1, Julie Newman2, Thomas F. Shipley3, Ellen M. Nelson1, Drew Davidson4, J. Douglas Walker4, Bailey K. Srimoungchanh4, Sarah F. Trevino5, Cristina Wilson6, Claire Martin2, Christine Regalla7, Cailey Condit8, and Nick Roberts9
Basil Tikoff et al.
  • 1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Geoscience, Madison, United States of America (basil@geology.wisc.edu)
  • 2Texas A&M University, College Station, United States of America
  • 3Temple University, Philadephia, United States of America
  • 4University of Kansas, Lawrence, United States of America
  • 5Southern Methodist University, Dallas, United States of America
  • 6Oregon State University, Corvallis, United States of America
  • 7Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, United States of America
  • 8University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America
  • 9Hamilton College, Clinton, United States of America

StraboField – part of the StraboSpot digital data system – allows researchers to share primary field data and observations, provide a context for sampling, and plot geological maps.  This presentation details recent developments within StraboField to facilitate multi-disciplinary studies and increase trust in digital data system.  On the basis of community feedback, we have recently introduced Documents, of which there are three types: Outcrop Summaries, Memos, and Models.  All of these Documents are designed to establish trust in the digital data, by establishing why a particular decision was made.  Outcrop summaries put uncertainty evaluation in the workflow of a field-based geologist, and allow the researcher to designate a Critical Outcrop.  There are four different types of critical outcrops: Exemplar, Confuser, Disambiguator, and Anchor.  Further, geologists can report analogous features observed elsewhere in the world that are guiding their interpretation.  Memos consist of five types: 1) Idea; 2) Plan; 3) Question; 4) Summary; and 5) Other (User defined).  Users can specify an intended audience for each report: Anyone, Collaborators, or Individual scientist.  Memos both facilitate collaborative work on the same project and enhance communication between practitioners with different expertise, working on similar projects.  Models allow geologists to describe one or multiple models, so that future observations can be tested against these models.  Memos and Models enable users to link spots together and to add additional context through notes, photos, sketches, and tags.  By including this information in digital data systems, future practitioners working with these datasets will have a clear understanding of how the data were collected and where there may be gaps worth researching. Documents are designed to emphasize and summarize important observations and connections in a field area to aid collaborators or other practitioners.  Critically, Documents retain a temporal ordering that records the development of a particular idea or model throughout a field project.  

How to cite: Tikoff, B., Newman, J., Shipley, T. F., Nelson, E. M., Davidson, D., Walker, J. D., Srimoungchanh, B. K., Trevino, S. F., Wilson, C., Martin, C., Regalla, C., Condit, C., and Roberts, N.: Advancing community workflows, interdisciplinary collaboration, communication, and trust in field based geologic data systems, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-5938, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-5938, 2026.