EGU26-6016, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-6016
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 06 May, 15:05–15:15 (CEST)
 
Room D1
Three-plate Dynamics of the Andean Earthquake Cycle
Mara A. Figueroa1,2, Demián D. Gómez1, Michael G. Bevis1, Robert Smalley, Jr.3, Andrés Folguera4, Silvana Spagnotto5, W. Ashley Griffith1, Bennett Kellmayer1, Dana Caccamise II6, Eric Kendrick1, and Patrick Smith1
Mara A. Figueroa et al.
  • 1School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
  • 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA (mara.figueroa.berroca@jpl.nasa.gov)
  • 3Center for Earthquake Research and Information, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
  • 4Instituto de Estudios Andinos, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 5Universidad Nacional de San Luis - CONICET, San Luis, Argentina
  • 6National Geodetic Survey, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, La Jolla, CA, USA

The South-Central Andes topography results from a three-plate framework, where the Andean block is compressed between the Nazca plate to the west and the South American craton to the east. Interseismic GNSS observations consistently show that basal décollements beneath the eastern fold-and-thrust belts accommodate permanent shortening through aseismic thrust creep. However, their behavior during great megathrust earthquakes has remained poorly understood.

We combine constraints from the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake with previous evidence from the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel and the 1995 Mw 8.0 Antofagasta earthquakes and demonstrate that basal décollements systematically creep in a normal sense during the coseismic phase. This backsliding occurs as a mechanical response to abrupt stress changes from megathrust rupture: the direction of décollement slip during earthquakes is opposite to their interseismic motion.

By integrating these coseismic observations with independent three-plate interseismic models, we present a unified framework for Andean orogenic-wedge dynamics that reconciles forearc-to-backarc deformation. This framework provides the first comprehensive explanation for the long-observed obliqueness deficiency in Andean megathrust slip distributions. Our results demonstrate that three-plate models are essential for accurately capturing both long-term orogenesis and the complete earthquake cycle, representing a paradigm shift from conventional two-plate approaches with broad implications for other subduction boundary zones and seismic hazard assessment worldwide.

 

How to cite: Figueroa, M. A., Gómez, D. D., Bevis, M. G., Smalley, Jr., R., Folguera, A., Spagnotto, S., Griffith, W. A., Kellmayer, B., Caccamise II, D., Kendrick, E., and Smith, P.: Three-plate Dynamics of the Andean Earthquake Cycle, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-6016, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-6016, 2026.