EGU26-6189, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-6189
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Thursday, 07 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Thursday, 07 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X4, X4.7
Why offline aridity diagnostics overestimate future drying: the role of feedback-inflated evaporative demand
Daeha Kim1 and Minha Choi2
Daeha Kim and Minha Choi
  • 1Department of Civil Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (daeha.kim@jbnu.ac.kr)
  • 2School of Civil, Architectural Engineering & Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea (mhchoi@skku.edu)

Offline aridity and drought indices have often implied widespread terrestrial drying under a warming environment, while Earth system models (ESMs) have projected modest changes in land-surface water fluxes. This persistent divergence has been typically attributed to missing vegetation physiological processes in offline frameworks. However, we here show that a more foundational cause is a structural inconsistency embedded in those diagnostics. Conventional potential evapotranspiration (PET) formulations can violate the assumption that precipitation (P) and atmospheric evaporative demand act as independent climatic constraints in the Budyko framework. Using open-water Penman and vegetation-responsive Penman–Monteith formulations forced by reanalysis data and ESM projections, we found that uncorrected PET strongly reflected land–atmosphere feedbacks, leading to pronounced negative P–PET correlations (-0.45 ± 0.29; mean ± s.d.). When PET was thermodynamically deflated, this dependence was largely removed (-0.02 ± 0.42), restoring consistency with the theoretical basis of Budyko-type diagnostics. This structural correction reduced inflation of the aridity index and substantially moderated projected evapotranspiration (ET) trends. Under a business-as-usual scenario, the trend of Budyko-based ET from uncorrected PET (+0.61 mm yr-2) exceeded that of CMIP6 ensemble mean (+0.28 mm yr-2) by more than a factor of two. CEP-deflated PET narrowed this discrepancy (+0.39 mm yr-2), while additional physiological adjustments provided comparatively smaller improvements. We suggest that violations of structural assumptions, rather than missing physiological processes alone, can play a central role in the divergence between offline aridity diagnostics and ESM hydrological projections.

Acknowledgement: This work was jointly supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2025-16070291 & RS-2024-00416443).

How to cite: Kim, D. and Choi, M.: Why offline aridity diagnostics overestimate future drying: the role of feedback-inflated evaporative demand, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-6189, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-6189, 2026.