EGU26-6459, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-6459
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Thursday, 07 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Thursday, 07 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X4, X4.71
Geoscience-Aware AI for Interpretable Seismic Interpretation of Mass Transport Deposits Using Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models
Feryal Batoul Talbi1, John Armitage2, Jean Charléty2, Alain Rabaute1, Antoine Bouziat2, Jean-Noël Vittaut3, and Sylvie Leroy1
Feryal Batoul Talbi et al.
  • 1Institute of Earth Sciences of Paris, Sorbonne University, CNRS-INSU, Paris, France
  • 2IFP Energies nouvelles, Rueil-Malmaison, France
  • 3Computer Science Laboratory of Paris 6 (UMR 7606), Sorbonne University, Paris, France

Seismic interpretation of mass transport deposits (MTDs) relies heavily on expert knowledge and conceptual reasoning yet remains difficult to formalize and scale. While recent artificial intelligence (AI) methods have shown strong capabilities in seismic pattern recognition, most approaches operate as black boxes and remain poorly aligned with the interpretative frameworks used by geoscientists, limiting transparency and trust.

 

This study proposes a geoscience-aware hybrid intelligence framework that integrates expert knowledge graphs (KGs) with large language models (LLMs) to support interpretable seismic interpretation of MTDs. The approach builds upon the conceptual methodology of Le Bouteiller et al. (2019), which organizes MTD interpretation through causal relationships linking environmental controls, mass transport properties, and observable seismic descriptors across trigger, transport, and post-deposition phases.

 

The KG provides a structured reference for interpretation that constrains vocabulary, causal direction, and temporal logic. Our workflow reads scientific papers, identifies relevant descriptors and processes, checks them with LLMs, and evaluates how well they support interpretation. In this setup, seismic descriptors give different levels of support (weak to strong) for geological processes, like how experts reason under uncertainty.

Preliminary results show that ~68% of expert defined concepts are recovered in the inferred graph, with a semantic validation score of 0.73, indicating good conceptual alignment. However, descriptor matching based on textual similarity remains difficult, with average scores around 0.41. This gap highlights the difference between semantic agreement (conceptually correct) and textual agreement (exact wording), mainly due to synonymy and variable phrasing in the literature. We plan to address this by using domain-specific LLMs and ontology-based synonym expansion to improve semantic matching in future iterations

How to cite: Talbi, F. B., Armitage, J., Charléty, J., Rabaute, A., Bouziat, A., Vittaut, J.-N., and Leroy, S.: Geoscience-Aware AI for Interpretable Seismic Interpretation of Mass Transport Deposits Using Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-6459, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-6459, 2026.