- 1NILU, Kjeller, Norway
- 2NTNU, Dept. of Energy and Process Engineering, IndEcol, Trondheim, Norway
- 3CEREGE (Aix-Marseille Univ., CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Coll. de France), Aix-en-Provence, France
- 4School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 5National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
- 6German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP), Berlin, Germany
- 7Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- 8Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- 9Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sopot, Poland
- 10Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Istituto di Scienze Marine (ISMAR), Rome, Italy
- 11Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), Ostend, Belgium
- 12Marine Institute, Galway, Ireland
- 13Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia
- 14GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany
- 15Department of Engineering, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
- 16European Marine Board, Oostende, Belgium
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is becoming increasingly relevant as a complement to rapid and sustained greenhouse gas emission reductions in overshoot pathways and pathways that limit warming to 1.5–2°C. Marine CDR (mCDR) could contribute by enhancing ocean uptake and storage of carbon, but only if Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) can robustly quantify net removals and detect impacts. Ensuring that such interventions are effective, verifiable, and environmentally sustainable requires robust MRV systems that enable transparent carbon accounting and early detection of impacts. Yet MRV for mCDR faces a fundamental challenge because the ocean is highly variable and strongly advective, and carbon and tracers can be rapidly redistributed across space, depth, and jurisdictional boundaries.
Building on the European Marine Board Future Science Brief on MRV for mCDR, which synthesises the state-of-the-art in MRV for mCDR and provides actionable recommendations for policymakers, practitioners, and research funders, this presentation highlights key scientific and operational priorities. We present a practical six-pillar MRV framework centred on baselines, additionality, detection and attribution, durability, non-CO2 greenhouse gases, and environmental and biodiversity indicators. The framework is designed to demonstrate that observed changes exceed natural variability and can be translated into net atmospheric CO2 removal with decision-relevant uncertainty.
We argue that fit-for-purpose MRV must integrate targeted in situ observations and autonomous platforms with mechanistic, regional, and Earth system modelling, supported by model–data fusion and machine learning where direct high-frequency or long-term measurements are not feasible. MRV should expand beyond net CO2 uptake to include indicators of impacts and side effects such as carbonate chemistry, oxygen, nutrients, and ecosystem responses, with monitoring intensity scaled to project ambition and risk and linked to adaptive management levers. We conclude with recommendations on standardised MRV requirements, sustained carbonate-system observing, stronger model validation against observations, and clear limits on scaling or co-deployment until MRV protocols are demonstrated, while rapid reductions in CO2 emissions remain the top priority.
How to cite: Muri, H., Sulpis, O., Arguello, G., Baker, C., Boettcher, M., García-Ibáñez, M. I., Kuliński, K., Landolfi, A., Landschützer, P., McGovern, E., Ninčević Gladan, Ž., Oschlies, A., Yfantis, E., and Muniz Piniella, Á.: Advancing Monitoring Reporting and Verification for marine Carbon Dioxide Removal, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-7055, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-7055, 2026.