EGU26-7579, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-7579
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PICO | Thursday, 07 May, 11:04–11:06 (CEST)
 
PICO spot 1b, PICO1b.7
GEDI-constrained forest mapping and Potential–Realized climate limits of canopy height, biomass and structural complexity in the upper Yellow River
Chongshan Wang, Jianye Yu, Yunfei Li, Fen Zhang, Zibo Wang, and Xiaohua Gou
Chongshan Wang et al.
  • Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China (wangchsh2023@lzu.edu.cn; yjianye2025@lzu.edu.cn; liyunfei@lzu.edu.cn; fzhang@lzu.edu.cn; wangzb2023@lzu.edu.cn; xhgou@lzu.edu.cn)

The upper Yellow River is a nationally important water-conservation region where forest three-dimensional structure supports carbon storage and hydrologic buffering. In this topographically complex forest–shrub–grass mosaic, watershed-scale constraints of forest structure by climate remain poorly quantified, and uncertainty in forest extent can propagate into subsequent structural mapping and attribution. We produced a GEDI (Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation) height-constrained hierarchical forest mask and generated 10–30 m forest cover with probability and quality-assurance layers for the upper Yellow River.

Using the Taohe River Basin as a representative catchment, UAV LiDAR benchmarks were upscaled with Sentinel-1/2 time-series metrics, topographic predictors and GEDI information to derive 30 m wall-to-wall canopy height, aboveground biomass (AGB) and canopy entropy, the latter representing vertical structural complexity. Independent evaluation indicates reliable performance (R² ≈ 0.71–0.84; canopy entropy R² = 0.836).

Forest structure–climate relationships were examined with a Potential–Realized framework. Climate-constrained structural potential was estimated using conditional upper-quantile models, and climatic limitation was quantified as the departure of realised structure from its potential. Hydrothermal thresholds are well defined: canopy height potential peaks at 2–4 °C mean annual temperature (≈ 25 m) and approaches saturation beyond 540–560 mm annual precipitation; the joint optimum for canopy height and AGB occurs under ~450–550 mm precipitation and 5–8 °C mean temperature; canopy entropy maximises near 2–4 °C, 450–550 mm, aridity index ≈ 1.2, and potential evapotranspiration ≈ 600 mm. Using downscaled CMIP6 projections and derived vapour pressure deficit (VPD), we quantify potential contraction and overshoot risk (current structure/future potential) and provide analysis-ready layers for climate-risk screening in water-source regions.

How to cite: Wang, C., Yu, J., Li, Y., Zhang, F., Wang, Z., and Gou, X.: GEDI-constrained forest mapping and Potential–Realized climate limits of canopy height, biomass and structural complexity in the upper Yellow River, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-7579, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-7579, 2026.