EGU26-7896, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-7896
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 07 May, 08:30–08:40 (CEST)
 
Room M1
Evaluation of the CMIP7 historical stratospheric aerosol forcing dataset
May Chim1,5, Dominik Stiller2,5, Elisa Ziegler3,5, Thomas J. Aubry4, and the CMIP7 Stratospheric Aerosol Forcing Evaluation Team*
May Chim et al.
  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Atmospheric and Climate Science, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA
  • 3Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
  • 4Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 5These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract

Stratospheric aerosol forcing, which primarily represents aerosols from explosive volcanic sulfur emissions, is a key natural forcing dataset for Phase 7 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP7) climate modelling experiments. The CMIP7 stratospheric aerosol forcing datasets for the historical period (1750-2023) include (1) stratospheric sulfate aerosol optical properties, and (2) upper tropospheric-stratospheric volcanic sulfur dioxide emissions. Understanding how historical volcanic forcing has changed from CMIP6 to CMIP7 is essential for interpreting differences in simulation results across CMIP phases and assessing model performance. A key methodological advance in CMIP7 is the emission-driven approach for pre-satellite era stratospheric aerosol optical properties, which incorporates additional ice-core-based volcanic sulfur emission data compared to CMIP6. In this study, we present a systematic evaluation comparing the CMIP6 and CMIP7 stratospheric aerosol forcing datasets against observations, including aerosol optical depth estimates from lunar eclipses, stellar extinction, and satellite retrievals. The comparison provides an in-depth analysis of spatial and temporal patterns in stratospheric aerosol optical depth across CMIP6 and CMIP7, examining both background climatology and selected large-magnitude eruptions in the pre-satellite and satellite eras. This evaluation highlights the key differences between CMIP6 and CMIP7 datasets, improvements achieved through updated methodologies, their potential implications for climate simulations, and directions for future forcing dataset development.

CMIP7 Stratospheric Aerosol Forcing Evaluation Team:

Brennan Rodgers, Matthew Toohey, Lucas Boissel, Sébastien Guillet, and Fresh Eyes on CMIP Modern Forcing Project Team

How to cite: Chim, M., Stiller, D., Ziegler, E., and Aubry, T. J. and the CMIP7 Stratospheric Aerosol Forcing Evaluation Team: Evaluation of the CMIP7 historical stratospheric aerosol forcing dataset, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-7896, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-7896, 2026.