EGU26-8373, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-8373
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 04 May, 11:55–12:25 (CEST)
 
Room D3
What we’ve learned from teaching people in prison to Think Like a Scientist 
Philip Heron1 and the Think Like A Scientist team*
Philip Heron and the Think Like A Scientist team
  • 1University of Toronto Scarborough, UTSC, Dept of Physical and Env Science, Canada (philip.heron@utoronto.ca)
  • *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract

Scientific thinking requires the critical analysis of information, while science itself thrives on the diversity of ideas. Yet, science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) subjects have historically struggled to be inclusive and accessible to students from underrepresented communities - meaning we often miss a diversity of voices. Furthermore, STEM subjects have often been rigid in their teaching structure, creating barriers to education for students with more specific (or unrecognised) learning needs.

To address this, our science outreach course Think Like A Scientist was designed to improve critical thinking and encourage independent thought by applying adaptive education practices to create inclusive and accessible classroom environments. The program started in 2017 and has been applied in several different settings (e.g., schools and adult learning centres), but has mainly featured in prisons around the world (including England, Canada, Australia, and Spain).

Our students in prison often have a complex relationship with learning – such as low confidence in themselves or the education system (which is also a common trait amongst STEM university students from diverse communities). In addition, a classroom can present numerous other barriers for prison students (e.g., sensory, communication, information processing, and regulation) which particularly impacts neurodivergent learners (e.g., autism, ADHD, OCD, dyslexia, etc.). In our teaching in prison, we have been conscious of creating different educational access points that are not solely reliant on rigid teaching structures.

In this Katia and Maurice Krafft Award talk, I will outline the choices we have made in prison education to increase educational engagement - and how these choices can map onto other avenues of science communication to widen STEM participation. I’ll also share the impact of such practices on our students and how placing learners at the centre of education can be transformative.  

Fundamentally, as a society we need an informed population of any background who can think critically, especially in today’s world of fake news. In our sessions, we replicate this through learning from each other to Think Like A Scientist.

Think Like A Scientist team:

James A. Williams, Dalton Harrison, Phoenix Leigh, Fabio Crameri, Grace E. Shephard, Elisabetta Febe Canaletti, Dalton Harrison, Sara Hashemi, Sophia Narayan, Kiona Osowski, Rosa Rantanen, Kath, Sam Hutchins, Mhairi Stewart, Danielle George, Rosie Reynolds, Aisha Sharif, Amber Lewis, Joshua Mogyorus, Anna F, Luc Doucet, Alison Blyth, Melissa M, Eleni Pitsiniaga, Maria Gabriela Tejada Toapanta, Janeesa Lewis-Nimako.

How to cite: Heron, P. and the Think Like A Scientist team: What we’ve learned from teaching people in prison to Think Like a Scientist , EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-8373, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-8373, 2026.