EGU26-8499, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-8499
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 08 May, 10:50–11:00 (CEST)
 
Room 1.15/16
Bridging Flash Drought Detection and Impact Assessment for Adaptive Water Management
Gabriela Gesualdo and Antonia Hadjimichael
Gabriela Gesualdo and Antonia Hadjimichael
  • Department of Geosciences, the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States of America (chiquito.gabriela@gmail.com)

Flash droughts emerge from the interaction of precipitation deficits, elevated temperatures, strong winds, and enhanced atmospheric evaporative demand. Their rapid onset poses significant challenges to conventional drought monitoring and decision-making frameworks, with impacts propagating across spatial scales, sectors, and regions not traditionally drought-prone. Existing detection methodologies exhibit substantial variability in event duration and intensification thresholds, often failing to account for regional hydroclimatic characteristics that modulate compound drought drivers. Major gaps persist in consistent detection, hampering effective monitoring, response, and impact assessment. We compare six widely used flash drought indicators based on evaporative demand, soil moisture, precipitation, and multivariate approaches across all contiguous United States catchments over 40 years. We quantify detection consistency, inter-method agreement, and trade-offs between single- and multi-indicator approaches. We further investigate the 2022 flash drought in the coastal state of Connecticut, where impacts dominated water supply in a typically humid region not commonly considered drought vulnerable. Results reveal pronounced inconsistencies among indicators, with limited agreement even between metrics derived from similar variables. Multi-indicator approaches improve robustness but can miss rapidly evolving events due to restrictive thresholds, while single-indicator methods risk over-detection. In Connecticut, only soil moisture-based indicators successfully captured flash drought conditions, demonstrating that standardized nationwide indices using alternative variables would have failed to detect the event, with important consequences for early warning and timely response. Drought declarations were issued only after intensification, constraining local response capacity and limiting mitigation potential, although subsequent voluntary water use reductions likely supported recovery. To address the disconnect between physical detection and real-world consequences, we introduce an impact-based assessment framework leveraging Natural Language Processing to extract and classify flash drought impacts from media reports. By linking detected events with observed societal impacts, this approach validates detection methods and improves sector-relevant monitoring. Our findings underscore the need for region- and sector-specific assessment frameworks integrating physical signals, impact data, and decision-making contexts—essential for managing rapidly evolving drought risks under increasing hydroclimatic variability.

How to cite: Gesualdo, G. and Hadjimichael, A.: Bridging Flash Drought Detection and Impact Assessment for Adaptive Water Management, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-8499, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-8499, 2026.