EGU26-9028, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-9028
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Friday, 08 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Friday, 08 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X4, X4.23
A multi-criteria screening evaluation of geological CO2 storage potential in Thailand
Sumet Phantuwongraj1, Piyaphong Piyaphong2, Sukonmeth Jitmahantakul2, Thitiphan Assawincharoenkij2, Thotsaphon Thotsaphon3, and Dalad Na Nakorn3
Sumet Phantuwongraj et al.
  • 1Center of Excellence in Morphology of Earth Surface and Advanced Geohazards in Southeast Asia (MESA CE), Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 2Applied Mineral and Petrology Special Task Force for Activating Research (AMP STAR), Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 3Department of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

To attain net-zero aims and mitigate climate change, large-scale carbon capture and geological storage of CO2 are necessary. Thailand's government aims to reduce CO2 emissions by 20% by 2030, compared to current levels. This study uses a national-scale GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to screen Thailand's lithology and sedimentary basins for CO2 storage capacity. We ranked geological, hydrogeological, and infrastructure data such as reservoir lithology and thickness, structural stability, formation depth, brine salinity, proximity to CO2 sources, and surface land use using six criteria. An analytical-hierarchy process (AHP) was used to weight these variables and get a composite appropriateness score for each region. The petroleum basin with Permian carbonate reservoir and the Khorat Plateau with Mesozoic sandstones are the two highest priority regions, according to the findings. These regions combine thick, well-sealed reservoirs with surrounding large emitters. The output prioritizes probable storage sites spatially, taking into account geological capacity, infrastructural, and social variables. This thorough screening approach, which uses the original data layers and figures, creates a reproducible framework for CCS site selection in Thailand and other rising nations.

How to cite: Phantuwongraj, S., Piyaphong, P., Jitmahantakul, S., Assawincharoenkij, T., Thotsaphon, T., and Na Nakorn, D.: A multi-criteria screening evaluation of geological CO2 storage potential in Thailand, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-9028, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-9028, 2026.