EGU26-9185, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-9185
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 06 May, 10:45–12:30 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 06 May, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X4, X4.78
Variability of the Seismic Response of the Rittershoffen Geothermal Reservoir to the Series of GRT-1 Stimulations
Emmanuel Gaucher1, Olivier Lengliné2, and Jean Schmittbuhl2
Emmanuel Gaucher et al.
  • 1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Applied Geosciences, Geothermal Energy and Reservoir Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany (emmanuel.gaucher@kit.edu)
  • 2University of Strasbourg, Institut Terre et Environnement de Strasbourg, France

Between April and June 2013, the GRT-1 well at the Rittershoffen geothermal site in the Upper Rhine Valley (France) underwent three distinct stimulation phases: first a thermal stimulation, then a chemical stimulation, and finally a hydraulic stimulation. These fluid injections significantly enhanced the injectivity index of the well, rendering it suitable for economic exploitation. Throughout these operations, a local surface seismic network continuously monitored the site, recording thousands of unfelt seismic events.

This study builds upon and refines the findings of Lengliné et al. (2017), who focused solely on the hydraulic stimulation of GRT-1, and Maurer et al. (2020), whose interpretations were constrained by uncertain absolute locations of seismic events, particularly in terms of depth. By employing an improved template matching technique and a relative location method, we established a comprehensive seismic event catalog comprising over 3,000 events.

This reliable catalog enables precise tracking of the reservoir’s seismogenic response to the successive yet distinct stimulation types, with high spatial and temporal resolution. Consequently, it allows for an investigation into the potential seismic interplay between these stimulations. Our analysis examines the evolution of key characteristics, including event distribution and clustering, b-value, and seismic injection efficiency across the stimulation phases. The observed differences prompt critical questions regarding the reliability of using responses from prior stimulations to forecast seismogenic behavior during subsequent operations, even for the same site.

How to cite: Gaucher, E., Lengliné, O., and Schmittbuhl, J.: Variability of the Seismic Response of the Rittershoffen Geothermal Reservoir to the Series of GRT-1 Stimulations, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-9185, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-9185, 2026.