EGU26-9545, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-9545
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Tuesday, 05 May, 15:10–15:20 (CEST)
 
Room 1.15/16
How Accurately Does LOFAR Reconstruct Lightning? Point and Extended Source Analysis
Paulina Turekova1,2, Brian Hare1,2, Olaf Scholten2, Marten Lourens1,2, Chris Sterpka1,2, Steven Cummer3, Joseph Dwyer4, and Ningyu Liu4
Paulina Turekova et al.
  • 1Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy (ASTRON), Groningen, Netherlands
  • 2Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  • 3Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy & Space Science Center (EOS), University of New Hampshire, Durham, USA

The polarization of VHF radio emissions from lightning offers valuable insight into the complex physics of lightning propagation by revealing the orientation of streamer-driven VHF radiation. Measuring and interpreting this polarization, however, remains challenging. In this work, we use the LOFAR radio telescope in combination with the latest near-field beamforming technique (A-TRID) that coherently combines antenna voltages while incorporating the full antenna response. This approach enables three-dimensional reconstruction of both the location and polarization of VHF lightning sources. In this presentation, we assess the accuracy of these results by means of a Monte Carlo error analysis. We simulate antenna voltage signals produced by a point-like dipole and an extended source, a cluster of indentical dipole emitters. Subsequently, we reconstruct them using the imaging algorithm. By comparing the reconstructed source parameters with the known inputs, we obtain an estimate of the location and polarization uncertainties. For point sources, we observe a sub-meter reconstruction accuracy in three-dimensional location; and an average one-degree reconstruction accuracy in three-dimensional polarization. These values vary with the source location and with the angle between the polarization vector and the radial vector. For extended sources, we see the reconstructed location (the source size) is smaller than the input; by up to a factor of two. The polarization reconstruction accuracy is different along the two axes; a sub-degree reconstruction accuracy along the azimuthal direction and an average 7.5-degree reconstruction accuracy along the zenithal direction. This report offers a comprehensive evaluation of the results, alongside a breakdown of our technical approach and algorithmic framework.

How to cite: Turekova, P., Hare, B., Scholten, O., Lourens, M., Sterpka, C., Cummer, S., Dwyer, J., and Liu, N.: How Accurately Does LOFAR Reconstruct Lightning? Point and Extended Source Analysis, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-9545, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-9545, 2026.