EGU26-9614, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-9614
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PICO | Monday, 04 May, 09:09–09:11 (CEST)
 
PICO spot 1a, PICO1a.14
Trace element mapping in vein calcite with synchrotron XFM: implications for U-Pb geochronology
Ismay Vénice Akker1, Christoph E. Schrank2, Michael W. M. Jones3,4, Daryl Howard5, Lorenzo Tavazzani6, and Luiz Morales6
Ismay Vénice Akker et al.
  • 1Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (ismay.akker@unibe.ch)
  • 2School of Earth and Atmospheric Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • 3Central Analytical Research Facility, Institute of Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • 4School of Chemistry and Physics, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • 5Australian Synchrotron, ANSTO, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • 6Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Geological Institute, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

U-Pb geochronology via Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) is a fast and reliable method for in-situ dating of calcite that is used across disciplines in earth science. However, the heterogeneous distribution of U (and Pb) in individual calcite crystals represents a yet unmitigated challenge and identifying zones of sufficiently high U concentrations that can provide precise constraints on timing of calcite precipitation is an inefficient “hit or miss” process. Moreover, it is challenging to confirm that targeted domains of a calcite crystal retain their pristine geochemical signature, given the range of post-crystallization dissolution-reprecipitation and solid diffusion processes that can affect this mineral. There is thus an urgent need to understand the spatial and temporal mechanisms of U incorporation and mobilization in calcite to ultimately improve this key geochronological tool. To determine where specific trace elements are located within calcite crystals, investigate how they are incorporated during crystal growth and how they are affected by post-crystallization fluid-assisted deformation processes, we applied Synchrotron X-Ray Fluorescence Microscopy (XFM) with emphasis on U mapping, Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD), and LA-ICP-MS to a set of calcite veins. Samples were collected from drillcores through the Middle and Upper Jurassic carbonates and marls (max. 85°C) in the Neogene Molasse Basin in central northern Switzerland. By combining high-resolution trace element maps with information on the crystal lattice structure of calcite we show two main textural types of trace element distributions within syntaxial calcite veins: 1) oscillatory crystal growth zonations that reflect preferential incorporation of trace elements into structurally different growth steps and faces of growing calcite crystals during growth and, 2) complete overprint of the initial growth zonation upon potential secondary fluid infiltration and trace element replacement. The anti-correlation between Fe, Mn and Sr, U demonstrates the role of kinetic factors during trace element partitioning between fluid and calcite, pointing to the inhibition of Fe incorporation at higher growth rates. Where the Sr uptake during calcite growth is generally enhanced with growth rate. The results of this project give valuable insights in the complexity of fluid overprint during multi-staged deformation cycles in the modification of trace elements in calcite, with clear implications for the applicability and reliability of U-Pb geochronometer in calcite.

How to cite: Akker, I. V., Schrank, C. E., Jones, M. W. M., Howard, D., Tavazzani, L., and Morales, L.: Trace element mapping in vein calcite with synchrotron XFM: implications for U-Pb geochronology, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-9614, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-9614, 2026.