EMS Annual Meeting Abstracts
Vol. 21, EMS2024-829, 2024, updated on 05 Jul 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2024-829
EMS Annual Meeting 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 02 Sep, 15:30–15:45 (CEST)| Aula Magna

Explaining neural networks for detection of tropical cyclones and atmospheric rivers in gridded atmospheric simulation data

Tim Radke1, Susanne Fuchs1, Christian Wilms3, Iuliia Polkova2,4,5, and Marc Rautenhaus1,2
Tim Radke et al.
  • 1Visual Data Analysis Group, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 20146, Germany
  • 2Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 20146, Germany
  • 3Computer Vision Group, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 22527, Germany
  • 4Institute of Oceanography, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 20146, Germany
  • 5now at Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach am Main, 63067, Germany

Detection of atmospheric features in gridded datasets from numerical simulation models is typically done by means of rule-based algorithms. Recently, also the feasibility of learning feature detection tasks using supervised learning with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has been demonstrated. This approach corresponds to semantic segmentation tasks widely investigated in computer vision. However, while in recent studies the performance of CNNs was shown to be comparable to human experts, CNNs are largely treated as a “black box”, and it remains unclear whether they learn the features for the correct reasons. Here we build on the recently published “ClimateNet” dataset that contains features of tropical cyclones and atmospheric rivers as detected by human experts. We adapt the explainable artificial intelligence technique “Layer-wise Relevance Propagation” (LRP) to the feature detection task and investigate which input information CNNs with the Context-Guided Network (CG-Net) and U-Net architectures use for feature detection. We find that both CNNs indeed consider plausible patterns in the input fields of atmospheric variables, which helps to build trust in the approach. We also demonstrate application of the approach for finding the most relevant input variables and evaluating detection robustness when changing the input domain. However, LRP in its current form cannot explain shape information used by the CNNs, and care needs to be taken regarding the normalization of input values, as LRP cannot explain the contribution of bias neurons, accounting for inputs close to zero. These shortcomings need to be addressed by future work to obtain a more complete explanation of CNNs for geoscientific feature detection.

How to cite: Radke, T., Fuchs, S., Wilms, C., Polkova, I., and Rautenhaus, M.: Explaining neural networks for detection of tropical cyclones and atmospheric rivers in gridded atmospheric simulation data, EMS Annual Meeting 2024, Barcelona, Spain, 1–6 Sep 2024, EMS2024-829, https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2024-829, 2024.