EMS Annual Meeting Abstracts
Vol. 21, EMS2024-97, 2024, updated on 05 Jul 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2024-97
EMS Annual Meeting 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Attributing urban evapotranspiration from eddy-covariance to surface cover: bottom-up versus top-down

Harro Jongen1,2, Stenka Vulova3,4, Fred Meier5, Gert-Jan Steeneveld2, Femke Jansen1, Dörthe Tetzlaff6,7, Birgit Kleinschmit3, Nasrin Haacke8, and Ryan Teuling1
Harro Jongen et al.
  • 1Hydrology and Quantitative Water Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
  • 2Wageningen University, Meteorology and Air Quality Section, Wageningen, Netherlands (gert-jan.steeneveld@wur.nl)
  • 3Geoinformation in Environmental Planning Lab, Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 4Department of Environmental Meteorology, Institute for Landscape Architecture and Landscape Planning, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany
  • 5Chair of Climatology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 6Department of Ecohydrology, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany.
  • 7Department of Geography, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 8Ecohydrology and Landscape Evaluation, Institute of Ecology, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Evapotranspiration (ET) is a key process in the hydrological cycle that can help mitigate urban heat. ET depends on the surface cover, as the surface affects the partitioning of precipitation between runoff and evapotranspiration. In urban neighborhoods, this surface cover is highly heterogeneous. The resulting neighborhood-scale ET is observed with eddy-covariance systems. However, these observations represent the signal from wind- and stability-dependent footprints resulting in a continuously changing surface cover composition. This continuous change prevents quantitative analysis of the separate types. Here, we disentangle this neighborhood-scale ET at two urban sites in Berlin attributing the ET dynamics to the four major surface cover types in the footprint: impervious surfaces, low vegetation, high vegetation, and open water. Starting from the surface, we reconstruct ET based on patch-scale observations and conceptual models. Alternatively, we start with the eddy-covariance observations and attribute ET to the surface cover types solving a system of equations for four eddy-covariance systems with different footprints. Although starting at the surface yields more robust results, both approaches indicate that vegetation is responsible for more ET than proportional to its surface fraction, and evaporation from impervious surfaces although less cannot be neglected. The behavior of each surface cover type is separated allowing to study the response to rainfall for each type separately. Impervious surfaces exhibit a strong ET peak directly after the rainfall event, while open water is insensitive to the rainfall. High vegetation starts with high ET after rainfall and limits ET within the first days, but low vegetation does not start limiting ET until the end of the warm season likely reaching the soil moisture limit. Additionally, we confirm the intuitive relation between ET and the surface cover fractions based on a wide range of surface compositions.

How to cite: Jongen, H., Vulova, S., Meier, F., Steeneveld, G.-J., Jansen, F., Tetzlaff, D., Kleinschmit, B., Haacke, N., and Teuling, R.: Attributing urban evapotranspiration from eddy-covariance to surface cover: bottom-up versus top-down, EMS Annual Meeting 2024, Barcelona, Spain, 1–6 Sep 2024, EMS2024-97, https://doi.org/10.5194/ems2024-97, 2024.