Planetary science researchers, whether making reference measurements of instrument performance or Earth analogs in a lab, or carrying out in-situ investigations around or on another body, generally focus on obtaining meaningful, high-quality results. Their output often is added to a publicly available archive, driven by funding or publication requirements. The community is becoming more aware of the effort needed to improve the usefulness and usability of their data, requiring intentional action that transforms work once destined for the library stacks into immortal data having broad reach, applicability, and use for the coming decades and beyond.
Investing seed capital
Creating immortal data requires a meticulous and forward-thinking approach to documentation, accessibility, and interoperability. This ensures that planetary science datasets not only serve their immediate purpose but also remain valuable resources for decades to come. Researchers must carefully construct their data with an emphasis on usability, reproducibility, and transparency, ensuring future scientists can interpret and apply these assets effectively. This should be done in partnership with the archiving agency, who can provide useful tools and consultation, and will curate these data beyond the lifetime of the researcher’s funding. The Planetary Data System (PDS), with established standards defined by its PDS4 data architecture and information model [1] provides such a framework.
Foundational to the process is the inclusion of robust metadata that serve as the structural backbone of a dataset, providing essential descriptions of experimental conditions, methodologies, instrumentation, calibration processes, and contextual background. Without detailed metadata, datasets become difficult to interpret, limiting their usability. A well-documented dataset should include comprehensive information about collection procedures, observational parameters, and any transformations or corrections applied post-collection. Additionally, metadata should be standardized across datasets to ensure consistency in archival and retrieval processes.
Closely tied to the need for thorough and thoughtful metadata is adherence to open science principles. Preserving data using standard, non-proprietary archive formats prevents obsolescence due to outdated software dependencies. Data transformation tools can assist with maintaining compatibility with commonly used tools, enhancing accessibility and usability. The archiving agency must anticipate future technological shifts and structure their standards and tools accordingly. Beyond formats, open science principles emphasize unrestricted access to datasets. Making data available without restrictive licensing enables researchers across disciplines to leverage the data for novel discoveries and interdisciplinary applications.
To maximize usability, datasets must adhere to FAIR principles—ensuring data is Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. Findability is key in ensuring that researchers can readily locate datasets relevant to their studies. This requires clear indexing, structured metadata, and search-friendly documentation. Datasets should be systematically cataloged, complete with proper identifiers and links to supplementary materials. Additionally, integrating datasets with established scientific repositories enhances discoverability. Accessibility involves making datasets easily retrievable, readable, and navigable. Much of the burden of adhering to FAIR principles falls on the archiving agency, especially beyond the conclusion of the funded research. However, the researcher must lead in the development and preparation of metadata required to support these principles.
Researchers should also prioritize interoperability, ensuring datasets seamlessly integrate with evolving analytical methodologies. Standardized protocols for data exchange and interoperability between repositories facilitate cross-disciplinary research. In planetary science, datasets must be compatible with diverse tools used in data analysis, visualization, and modeling. Reusability underscores the importance of structuring data in a way that allows future scientists to apply it across different contexts.
Immortal data on the mission level
Scaling creation of long-lived, impactful data to the mission level underscores the complexities involved in data preservation and accessibility. Planetary missions typically deploy multiple instruments, each managed by a specialized team focused on its specific development and research objectives. While this structure optimizes individual instrument performance and scientific output, it often results in fragmented data archives, where essential metadata for connecting observations across instruments, and even across missions, is insufficiently captured. Ideally, properly documented observations follow strict standards that expose such cross-instrument and cross-mission relationships.
A significant challenge stems from the evolving nature of data product creation throughout the mission life cycle. During the pre-launch phase, mission teams concentrate on developing data products that are expected to be of high interest to both the operations team and the broader science community. These early-stage definitions often prioritize operational efficiency and immediate scientific goals. However, as the mission progresses, new data products emerge, sometimes out of necessity, sometimes from unexpected scientific opportunities. While some of these newly defined products find their way into formal archives, others remain confined to mission websites, where they are made available to the public in an ad hoc manner. Still others are never publicly accessible, limiting their potential contribution to future research.
Another recurring shortfall in mission data management is the failure to capture, document, and archive materials that provide essential context such as why specific measurements were taken or particular targets were of interest. Historically, few resources have been devoted to capturing or archiving these materials. Including non-archived resources such as daily operations reports, activity plans, observation targets, and other mission records in the PDS Analyst’s Notebook [2] vastly improves accessibility and usability of landed mission archives for the broader research community. However, these materials rarely have dedicated champions advocating for their systematic capture and integration into archives alongside instrument data. Without careful documentation, metadata linking observational data to mission context, and the addition of non-traditional materials in the archive, future researchers, especially those outside the original mission team, face significant hurdles in applying archival data to new investigations.
Conclusion
Intentionality in data preservation does more than safeguard scientific records, it ensures that planetary science research remains a dynamic and evolving legacy. By embracing best practices in metadata structuring, accessibility, and principled archival strategies, researchers forge scientific assets with lasting significance. Immortal data empowers future scientists to repurpose archived observations, apply novel analytical techniques, and contribute to long-term planetary exploration.
References
[1] Planetary Data System. (2025). PDS4 Information Model Specification (Version 1.26). NASA. Retrieved from https://pds.nasa.gov/datastandards/documents/im/current
[2] Stein, T. et al. (2025) LPS LVI, abstract #2438