Europlanet Science Congress 2020
Virtual meeting
21 September – 9 October 2020
Europlanet Science Congress 2020
Virtual meeting
21 September – 9 October 2020
EPSC Abstracts
Vol. 14, EPSC2020-354, 2020, updated on 19 Jan 2021
Europlanet Science Congress 2020
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Monitoring Neptune's atmosphere with small and large telescopes: results for 2019

Ricardo Hueso1, Imke de Pater2, Erandi Chavez2, Amy Simon3, Larry Sromovsky4, Agustín Sánchez-Lavega1, Mike Wong2, Patrick Fry4, Marc Delcroix5, Vik Dhillon6,7, Jorge Hernández-Bernal1, Peio Iñurrigarro1, Stuart Littlefair6, Tom Marsh8, Iñaki Ordoñez-Etxeberria1, Santiago Pérez-Hoyos1, Erin Redwing2, Jose Félix Rojas1, and Joshua Tollefson2
Ricardo Hueso et al.
  • 1Física Aplicada I, Escuela de Ingeniería de Bilbao, UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Spain (
  • 2Department of Astronomy, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
  • 3Goddard Space Flight Centre Washington, USA
  • 4Space Sciences and Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
  • 5Societé Astronomique de France, Paris, France
  • 6Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • 7Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias (IAC), La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
  • 8Warwick Univesity, Warwick, United Kingdom

Neptune’s atmosphere is highly dynamic with atmospheric systems observable as bands and discrete cloud systems that evolve in time scales of days, weeks and years. Most of them are observed as tropospheric clouds and elevated hazes that appear highly contrasted in observations obtained in hydrogen and methane absorption bands in the red and near-infrared spectrum of the planet. Given the small size of Neptune as observed from Earth (2.3 arcsec), it is difficult to characterize most of these clouds. Basic questions such as if they are convective storms, vortices or clouds detached from atmospheric waves or bands can be difficult for an specific feature in a given observation [1]. Only Adaptive Optics or lucky-imaging instruments in 8-m telescopes or larger, and HST, can provide suitable data, but the difficulty to access enough observational time in these facilities suggests that a combination of data from several observing programs can help. Smaller telescopes can also play an important role since they can be used to follow the main cloud systems and cover the gaps between observations obtained by the larger telescopes. This can provide the life-time or drift rates of the largest meteorological systems allowing to compare observations of the same features observed months apart in the largest telescopes.

During the last few years we have combined observations obtained from a variety of telescopes to study the major cloud systems and understand their life-time and evolution [2, 3], including those of “companion” clouds linked to rare dark vortices that are only observable in blue wavelengths from space [2, 4, 5]. In this work we present our data for 2019 which consists of the following observations:

  • HST observations from the Outer Planets Atmospheres Legacy program (OPAL).
  • Several sets from Keck and Lick telescopes from different programs including some relatively frequent observations from the TWILIGHT program.
  • GTC observations with the HiperCam instrument doing lucky-imaging.
  • Calar Alto 2.2m telescope with the PlanetCam lucky-imaging instrument.
  • One single observation from Gemini while testing an AO system.
  • Additional observations from the Pic du Midi 1.05 m telescope.
  • Images provided by amateur astronomers and available through the PVOL [6] database.

The combination of these data suggests more variability and less cloud activity in 2019 than in previous years with a lower number of features in the data sets obtained with smaller telescopes. We provide the identification of particular meteorological systems over late summer 2019 and present drift rates of different mid-latitude features in the south hemisphere that are close but separated enough to the Voyager zonal winds to deserve attention. Other cloud systems in the south polar region and north tropics seem to follow the Voyager wind profile.

Future punctual observations achievable with new observational facilities such as the JWST will benefit from the evolutionary time-lines of the major cloud systems of Neptune and their drift rates in the atmosphere provided by similar future campaigns.


[1] Hueso and Sánchez-Lavega, Atmospheric Dynamics and Vertical Structure of Uranus and Neptune's weather layers. Space Science Reviews, 2019.

[2] Hueso et al., Neptune long-lived atmospheric features in 2013-2015 from small (28-cm) to large (10-m) telescopes. Icarus, 2017.

[3] Molter et al., Analysis of Neptune's 2017 Bright Equatorial Storm, Icarus, 2019.

[4] Wong et al., A New Dark vortex on Neptune, The Astronomical Journal, 2018.

[5] Hsu et al., Lifetimes and Occurrence Rates of Dark Vortices on Neptune from 25 Years of Hubble Space Telescope Images, The Astronomical Journal, 2018.

[6] Hueso et al., The Planetary Virtual Observatory and Laboratory (PVOL) and its integration into the Virtual European Solar and Planetary Access (VESPA), Planetary Space Science, 2018.

How to cite: Hueso, R., de Pater, I., Chavez, E., Simon, A., Sromovsky, L., Sánchez-Lavega, A., Wong, M., Fry, P., Delcroix, M., Dhillon, V., Hernández-Bernal, J., Iñurrigarro, P., Littlefair, S., Marsh, T., Ordoñez-Etxeberria, I., Pérez-Hoyos, S., Redwing, E., Rojas, J. F., and Tollefson, J.: Monitoring Neptune's atmosphere with small and large telescopes: results for 2019, Europlanet Science Congress 2020, online, 21 September–9 Oct 2020, EPSC2020-354,, 2020

Comments on the presentation

to access the discussion