Europlanet Science Congress 2020
Virtual meeting
21 September – 9 October 2020
Europlanet Science Congress 2020
Virtual meeting
21 September – 9 October 2020
EPSC Abstracts
Vol. 14, EPSC2020-397, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2020-397
Europlanet Science Congress 2020
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

In-situ detection of cometary cyanogen (NCCN)

Nora Hänni1, Kathrin Altwegg1, Boris Pestoni1, Martin Rubin1, Isaac Schroeder1, Markus Schuhmann1, and Susanne Wampfler2
Nora Hänni et al.
  • 1University of Bern, Physikalisches Institut, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland (nora.haenni@space.unibe.ch)
  • 2University of Bern, Center for Space and Habitability, Gesellschaftsstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland

For a long time it was thought that the cyano (CN) radical, observed remotely many times in various stellar and interstellar environments, is exclusively a photodissociation product of hydrogen cyanide (HCN). Bockelée-Morvan et al. (1984) first questioned this notion based on remote observations of comet IRAS-Araki-Alcock. They reported an upper limit for the HCN production rate which was smaller than the CN production rate previously derived by A’Hearn et al. (1983). Even today, this discrepancy observed for some comets is not resolved although many alternative parents have been suggested. Among the volatile candidates, cyanogen (NCCN), cyanoacetylene (HC3N) and acetonitrile (CH3CN), according to Fray et al. (2005), are the most promising ones. While cyanoacetylene and acetonitrile are known to be present in trace amounts in comets, as reported for comet Hale-Bopp by Bockelée-Morvan et al. (2000) and for comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko by Le Roy et al. (2015) and Rubin et al. (2019), the abundance of cyanogen in comets is unknown. Altwegg et al. (2019) were the first to mention its detection in the inner coma of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, target of ESA’s Rosetta mission.

In this work, we track the signatures of cyanogen in the ROSINA/DFMS (Rosetta Orbiter Spectrometer for Ion and Neutral Analysis/ Double Focusing Mass Spectrometer; Balsiger et al. (2007)) data, collected during the Rosetta mission phase. We derive abundances relative to water for three distinct periods, indicating that cyanogen is not abundant enough to explain the CN production in comet 67P together with HCN. Our findings are consistent with the non-detection of cyanogen in the interstellar medium.

 

A’Hearn M.F., Millis R.L., 1983, IAU Circ., 3802

Altwegg K., Balsiger H., Fuselier S.A., 2019, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 57, 113–55

Balsiger H. et al., 2007, Space Science Reviews, 128, 745-801

Bockelée-Morvan D., Crovisier J., Baudry A., Despois D., Perault M., Irvine W.M., Schloerb F.P., Swade D., 1984, Astron. Astrophys., 141, 411-418

Bockelée-Morvan et al., 2000, Astron. Astrophys., 353, 1101–1114.

Fray N., Bénilan Y., Cottin H., Gazeau M.-C., Crovisier J., 2005, Planetary and Space Science, 53, 1243-1262

Le Roy L. et al., 2015, Astron. Astrophys., 583, A1

Rubin M. et al., 2019, MNRAS, 489, 594-607

How to cite: Hänni, N., Altwegg, K., Pestoni, B., Rubin, M., Schroeder, I., Schuhmann, M., and Wampfler, S.: In-situ detection of cometary cyanogen (NCCN), Europlanet Science Congress 2020, online, 21 Sep–9 Oct 2020, EPSC2020-397, https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2020-397, 2020.