Europlanet Science Congress 2020
Virtual meeting
21 September – 9 October 2020
Europlanet Science Congress 2020
Virtual meeting
21 September – 9 October 2020
EPSC Abstracts
Vol.14, EPSC2020-605, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2020-605
Europlanet Science Congress 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Jupiter's Temperate Belt/Zone Contrasts at Depth Revealed By Juno

Leigh N. Fletcher1, Fabiano Oyafuso2, Michael Allison3, Andrew Ingersoll4, Liming Li5, Yohai Kaspi6, Eli Galanti6, Michael Wong7, Glenn Orton2, Zhimeng Zhang4, Cheng Li8, Steve Levin2, and Scott Bolton9
Leigh N. Fletcher et al.
  • 1University of Leicester, School of Physics and Astronomy, Leicester, United Kingdom (leigh.fletcher@leicester.ac.uk)
  • 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA.
  • 3Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA
  • 4California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
  • 5University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
  • 6Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
  • 7SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, 94043-5139
  • 8Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA.
  • 9Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, TX, USA

Introduction:  The locations of Jupiter’s cloud-top east-west jets are relatively constant over time and define the cyclonic belts and their neighbouring anticyclonic zones.  Thermal-infrared observations of the upper troposphere reveal cool temperatures, elevated abundances of condensate and disequilibrium gases, and enhanced cloud opacity over the zones, and the opposite over the belts (Gierasch et al., 1986, doi:10.1016/0019-1035(86)90125-9).  This distribution implies upwelling motions in zones and subsidence in belts. However, this picture has been called into question by the observed eddy-momentum flux convergence into the eastward jets (and divergence from the westward jets), which suggests a compensating flow in the opposite direction, from belts into zones, which is partially supported by the distribution of lightning at low latitudes (Little et al., 1999, doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6195).  It is possible that two different atmospheric regimes exist:  a deep regime where eddies are able to drive the zonal flows, and a higher-altitude regime where those zonal flows decay with height. Reconciling this apparent inconsistency remains a key challenge for the understanding of Jupiter’s atmosphere, and Juno observations of the deeper atmosphere shed important light on this issue. 

Methodology:  Juno’s Microwave Radiometer (MWR) examines the vertical structure of Jupiter’s belts and zones below the clouds by sounding in six channels from 1.4 to 50 cm, sensing from the cloud-tops at ~0.7 bar to pressures greater than 300 bar. Initial results (Li et al. 2017, doi:10.1002/2017GL073159) revealed contrasts at depth that bore a potential resemblance to the belt/zone structure in the upper troposphere.  We report on progress in our analysis of averaged nadir microwave brightness and its emission-angle dependence from the first two years of Juno’s mission.  We investigate the correlation between the meridional gradient of the brightness temperature at all emission angles and the cloud-top zonal winds.  These brightness temperature gradients reflect changes in gaseous opacity (e.g., ammonia and water), kinetic temperature, or both. We explore the implications of the contrasts observed between belts and zones as a function of depth sounded by MWR.

Preliminary Results:  Meridional brightness temperature gradients above the clouds (p<1 bar) were measured by the VLT/VISIR mid-infrared instrument in 2016, alongside the 1.37-cm MWR channel sensing temperatures and ammonia at p~0.7 bar. The gradients show a strong negative correlation with the cloud-tracked zonal winds and suggest a combination of zonal jet decay with altitude in the upper troposphere (e.g., Pirraglia et al., 1981, doi:10.1038/292677a0), along with depletion of volatiles (ammonia) within cyclonic belts.  MWR observations suggest that this negative correlation persists as deep as ~1.5 – 3.5 bar for both the tropical and temperate jets.  For the strong eastward jet near 6oN, this is broadly consistent with results from both the Galileo Probe (Atkinson et al., 1998, doi:10.1029/98JE00060) and Cassini cloud-tracking (Li et al., 2006, doi:10.1029/2005JE002556), which suggested that the jet decayed with height from the ~5-bar level to the 0.5-bar level by more than 90 m/s.  We will report on our initial exploration of how these correlations change at deeper pressure levels by looking at MWR wavelengths beyond 10 cm, probing well below the expected condensation level of Jupiter’s water clouds.

Acknowledgements:  Fletcher was supported by a Royal Society Research Fellowship and European Research Council Consolidator Grant (under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, grant agreement No 723890) at the University of Leicester.  Levin, Orton, and Oyafuso were supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration through funds distributed to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.

How to cite: Fletcher, L. N., Oyafuso, F., Allison, M., Ingersoll, A., Li, L., Kaspi, Y., Galanti, E., Wong, M., Orton, G., Zhang, Z., Li, C., Levin, S., and Bolton, S.: Jupiter's Temperate Belt/Zone Contrasts at Depth Revealed By Juno, Europlanet Science Congress 2020, online, 21 September–9 Oct 2020, EPSC2020-605, https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2020-605, 2020