EPSC Abstracts
Vol. 17, EPSC2024-188, 2024, updated on 03 Jul 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2024-188
Europlanet Science Congress 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Analysis of photocentre offset from Gaia astrometry on selected asteroids and planetary satellites

Ziyu Liu1, Przemyslaw Bartczak3,4, Daniel Hestroffer1, Dagmara Oszkiewicz4, Josselin Desmars1,2, Pedro David1, Valery Lainey1, Agnieszka Kryszczyńska4, and Karolina Dziadura4
Ziyu Liu et al.
  • 1IMCCE, Paris Observatory, CNRS, univ. PSL, Sorbonne université, univ. Lille, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France
  • 2Institut Polytechnique des Sciences Avancées IPSA, 63b Bd. de Brandebourg, 94200, Ivry-sur-Seine, France
  • 3Instituto Universitario de Física Aplicada a las Ciencias y las Tecnologías (IUFACyT). Universidad de Alicante, Ctra. San Vicente del Raspeig s/n. 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain
  • 4Astronomical Observatory Institute, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, ul. Sloneczna 36, 60-286 Poznan, Poland

The Gaia space mission provides highly precise astrometric data  about 160,000 solar system objects. Because the object is extended and Gaia observes at a non-zero solar phase angle, the measurement is subject to a photocentre-barycentre shift effect. In other words, astrometry records the centre of the illuminated part (photocentre) of the celestial body instead of the actual centre of mass. This displacement is determined by the surface properties, size, spin and shape of the target [1]. The effect can be shown by statistically significant residuals after the fitting of heliocentric or planetocentric orbits using Gaia astrometric data. The typical magnitude of the offsets for the largest bodies (with diameters > 100km) is of a few mill-arcseconds, larger than the Gaia precision. 

 

In this work, we used two approaches to correct the effect. The first is to assume that the body is a sphere and use an analytical formula to estimate the offset [2], which is a valid approximation for dwarf planets or planetary satellites. Secondly, we directly used the simulated displacement from a complex shape model by reconstructing the Gaia-object-Sun geometry at the observation epoch. This is done by using an updated spin and shape topographic model derived from photometric data (including Gaia DR3 photometry) using the Sage method [3,4]. 

 

In the presentation, we will show the effect of the photocentre correction using both methods on a selection of large asteroids and Jovian satellites. 

 

[1] L. Lindegren, “Meridian observations of planets with a photoelectric multislit micrometer.,”, vol. 57, no. 1-2, pp. 55–72, May 1977

[2] D. Hestroffer, “Photocentre displacement of minor planets: analysis of HIPPARCOS astrometry,”, vol. 336, pp. 776–781, Aug. 1998.

[3] P. Bartczak and G. Dudziński, “Shaping asteroid models using genetic evolution (SAGE),”, vol. 473, no. 4, pp. 5050–5065, Feb. 2018. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2535. arXiv: 1904.08940 [astro-ph.EP].

[4] P. Bartczak et al, “Synergy between SAGE and SHAPE algorithms for modelling the physical parameters of asteroids,”  in European Planetary Science Congress, Sep. 2024, EPSC2024.

How to cite: Liu, Z., Bartczak, P., Hestroffer, D., Oszkiewicz, D., Desmars, J., David, P., Lainey, V., Kryszczyńska, A., and Dziadura, K.: Analysis of photocentre offset from Gaia astrometry on selected asteroids and planetary satellites, Europlanet Science Congress 2024, Berlin, Germany, 8–13 Sep 2024, EPSC2024-188, https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2024-188, 2024.