EPSC Abstracts
Vol. 19, EPSC2026-251, 2026, updated on 02 Jul 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2026-251
Europlanet Science Congress 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 07 Sep, 16:42–16:54 (CEST)| Room Neptune (Spinoza Foyer)
Anthropogenic Contamination of the Lunar Surface: Characterizing the Effects of the Chang’e-4 Landing on Lunar Surface Properties
Thomas Maynadié1,2, Yoshifumi Futaana1, Stas Barabash1, Martin Wieser1, Xiao-Dong Wang1, and Aibing Zhang3,4
Thomas Maynadié et al.
  • 1Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF), Solar System Physics and Space Technology (SSPT), Kiruna, Sweden
  • 2Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
  • 3National Space Science Center (NSSC), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China
  • 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Abstract:

Surface alteration by the exhaust plumes of lunar landers is a major concern when interpreting measurements acquired at the lunar surface [1–3]. For example, because the spectral and angular properties of lunar-emitted particles depend on regolith structure and mineralogy [4–8], lander-induced surface contamination is expected to affect particle emissions over several hundred meters around the landing site. However, the effects of lander-induced regolith disturbances on lunar particle emissions remain poorly constrained due to the lack of dedicated in situ investigations.

Using energetic neutral atom (ENA) measurements from the Advanced Small Analyzer for Neutrals (ASAN) [9] onboard the Chang’e-4 rover Yutu-2, we investigate variations in the spectral and angular properties of backscattered hydrogen ENAs as a function of distance from the Chang’e-4 lander. Excluding periods when the precipitating solar wind was disturbed by the South Pole–Aitken magnetic anomaly [10], we obtain 30 energy spectra acquired at distances of 30–930 m from the Chang’e-4 lander over a 4.5-year interval beginning one months after landing. For each spectrum, we applied a Bayesian inference method to derive the hydrogen surface binding energy and angular scattering function using an empirical hydrogen ENA energy spectrum model [6].

Our analysis shows that the surface binding energy inferred from ASAN observations is lower, at 5.0 ± 1.8 eV, within the first 150 m from the lander, compared to 6.2 ± 2.9 eV at larger distances. This transition distance of 150 m is comparable to the size of blast zones produced by previous lunar landers, suggesting that the same surface alteration processes responsible for the visible blast zone also modify the energy spectrum of lunar-emitted particles. In contrast, we find no significant dependence of the scattering function on distance from the lander. This result is contrary to previous expectations, namely that lander plume–induced disturbances in the micrometer-scale structure of the regolith inferred from photometric measurements would affect the ENA angular scattering function [1,4]. These results motivate future investigations of surface alteration using rover-borne particle instruments, particularly during the first lunar day, when transient contamination is expected [2] but not covered by the ASAN dataset.

References:

[1] Clegg-Watkins et al. (2016). Icarus, 273, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.12.010.

[2] Farrell et al. (2022). Icarus 376: 114857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114857.

[3] Prem et al. (2020). JGR: Planets, 125(8), e2020JE006464. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JE0064643

[4] Kenmotsu et al. (2004). Journal of Plasma and Fusion Research, 80 (5), 406–9. https://doi.org/10.1585/jspf.80.406.

[5] Szabo et al. (2023). JGR: Planets, 128 (9), e2023JE007911. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JE007911.

[6] Wieser et al. (2024). A&A, 684, A146. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348876.

[7] Ricketts et al. (2025). The Planetary Science Journal, 6 (10), 244. https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ae113e.

[8] Canu-Blot et al. (2026). A&A, in press: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202659499.

[9] Wieser et al. (2020). Space Science Reviews, 216(4), 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00691-w.

[10] Maynadié et al. (2026). JGR: Space Physics, 131(4), e2026JA035258. https://doi.org/10.1029/2026JA035258.

How to cite: Maynadié, T., Futaana, Y., Barabash, S., Wieser, M., Wang, X.-D., and Zhang, A.: Anthropogenic Contamination of the Lunar Surface: Characterizing the Effects of the Chang’e-4 Landing on Lunar Surface Properties, Europlanet Science Congress 2026, The Hague, The Netherlands, 7–11 Sep 2026, EPSC2026-251, https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2026-251, 2026.