ICUC12-320, updated on 21 May 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/icuc12-320
12th International Conference on Urban Climate
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Methane sources in cities re-interpretated using new laboratory results
Roisin Commane1, Andrew Hallward-Driemeier2, Luke Schiferl2, and Yuwei Zhao2
Roisin Commane et al.
  • 1Columbia University, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Dept. Earth and Environmental Sciences, Palisades, United States of America (r.commane@columbia.edu)
  • 2Columbia University, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Dept. Earth and Environmental Sciences, Palisades, United States of America

The New York Metro Area (pop. 20M) is the most populous urban area in the United States of America (USA) and the largest urban source of CO2 and methane (CH4) in the US. Our urban core observatory in Manhattan and background tower sites in rural areas around the city allow us to study the source characteristics of various greenhouse gas and related air pollutant fluxes in the city. Using our observations, an atmospheric transport model (HRRR-STILT), and various prior emissions estimates, we have quantified the city-scale emission rate of methane and carbon monoxide (CO) and during multiple winter-to-spring transitions (Jan-May 2019-2024) and year-round since May 2023. We find that the observed city-scale methane fluxes from NYC are 2-3 times higher than expected from inventories. The fraction of natural gas in mixed methane source areas is often quantified by comparing the observed atmospheric ethane (C2H6):CH4 ratio to that reported in the pipeline. However, this approach assumes no change in the C2H6:CH4 ratio during the natural gas combustion process. We observed depleted ethane (lower C2H6:CHratios) in combustion plumes with high CO. In the laboratory, we sampled the stack exhaust of a natural gas boiler and found badly operated boilers can release CH4, C2H6 and CO during the incomplete combustion of natural gas, but with C2H6 depleted relative to the C2H6:CH4 ratio of the incoming pipeline. Previous studies using ethane:methane would have underestimated the natural gas contribution of methane emission if they assumed an unchanged C2H6:CH4 ratio. We continue to characterize street, rooftop and point source methane emissions within and around the city using this new understanding of C2H6:CH4:CO ratios to understand the source characteristics of methane emitted from pre- and post-meter natural gas, wastewater treatment plants and landfills.

How to cite: Commane, R., Hallward-Driemeier, A., Schiferl, L., and Zhao, Y.: Methane sources in cities re-interpretated using new laboratory results, 12th International Conference on Urban Climate, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 7–11 Jul 2025, ICUC12-320, https://doi.org/10.5194/icuc12-320, 2025.

Supporters & sponsors