OOS2025-3, updated on 26 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-3
One Ocean Science Congress 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Continued transitions from fish meal and oil in aquafeeds require close attention to biodiversity trade-offs
Gage Clawson1,2,3, Julia Blanchard1,2, Marceau Cormery4, Elizabeth Fulton2,5, Benjamin Halpern3,6, Helen Hamilton4, Casey O'Hara3, and Richard Cottrell1,2,7
Gage Clawson et al.
  • 1University of Tasmania, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Australia
  • 2Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
  • 3National Center for Ecological Analysis, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, USA
  • 4BioMar Group, Aarhus, Denmark
  • 5Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Environment, Hobart, Australia.
  • 6Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, USA
  • 7Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Feed constitutes a considerable portion of the environmental impact embedded in farmed fish production, making it a pivotal factor in enhancing aquaculture sustainability. While research has evaluated the environmental pressures of feed production, no other spatially explicit global biodiversity assessment of animal feeds exists, and we provide a new approach. Here, we assess biodiversity impacts on 54,628 marine and terrestrial species for two contrasting Atlantic salmon feeds. We find widespread impact on both marine (~89%) and terrestrial (~71%) species, yet relatively small average magnitude of impact. Despite minimising wild-sourced fishmeal and oil by necessity, greater agricultural dependence for feed provisioning appears to have disproportionately exasperated impacts on terrestrial taxa. Our results provide key information for sourcing aquafeed to minimise impacts and optimise sustainability. As the aquaculture industry expands, feed sourcing decisions can reduce the sectors’ contribution to the global biodiversity crisis and meet emerging biodiversity standards. 

How to cite: Clawson, G., Blanchard, J., Cormery, M., Fulton, E., Halpern, B., Hamilton, H., O'Hara, C., and Cottrell, R.: Continued transitions from fish meal and oil in aquafeeds require close attention to biodiversity trade-offs, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-3, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-3, 2025.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material file

Comments on the supplementary material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

supplementary materials version 1 – uploaded on 28 May 2025, no comments