OOS2025-622, updated on 26 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-622
One Ocean Science Congress 2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Adding an aggregate sustainability gap metric to ocean accounting: a Blue ESGAP application in South-East Asia
Daniela Carranza1,2, Rico Ancog3, Marie Bonnin1,4, Marine Herrmann5, Sophie Lanco2, Oskar Lecuyer6, Heidi Retnoningtyas7, Annisya Rosdiana7, Ardanti Sutarto8, Irfan Yulianto7,9, and Adrien Comte1
Daniela Carranza et al.
  • 1IRD, Univ Brest, CNRS, Ifremer, LEMAR, F-29280 Plouzané, France (danielacarranzag@gmail.com)
  • 2MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Sète, France
  • 3School of Environmental Science and Management (SESAM), University of the Philippines Los Baños (UPLB), Philippines
  • 4Faculté des sciences Semlalia, Université Cadi Ayyad, Morocco
  • 5LEGOS, IRD, Toulouse, France / Bangkok, Thaïland
  • 6Agence Française de Développement (AFD), Paris, France
  • 7Rekam Nusantara Foundation, Bogor, Indonesia
  • 8Agence Française de Développement (AFD), Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 9IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

In response to defined Sustainable Development Goals and planetary boundaries, environmental policymakers need to monitor the state of the environment to evaluate the effectiveness of their actions and to prioritize policies. In the case of ocean sustainability, there is a rapidly moving research and political agenda on the development of ocean accounts, with the adoption of the System of Environmental Economic Accounting – Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EA) and the structuring of the ocean accounting community around the Global Ocean Accounting Partnership. The Environmental Sustainability Gap (ESGAP) framework is being developed to provide a reporting system at the national level aligned with strong sustainability principles that allows an operational dialogue between science and public policies. It is intended to complement current ocean accounting initiatives by introducing a synthetic dashboard of state indicators from a strong sustainability perspective, adopting strict criteria on the maintenance of critical natural capital. This work focuses on implementing and extending the ESGAP framework to include other dimensions related to ocean sustainability in two case-studies in South-East Asia: Indonesia and the Philippines. There is a mismatch between the scale at which decision-making takes place and the scale at which ecological processes underlying critical natural capital occur, which parallels a tension between scientific and political definitions of ocean sustainability objectives. There is uneven availability of information on the four environmental functions that compose the ESGAP, i.e., source, sink, life-support and human health and welfare. The Blue ESGAP provides another perspective on ocean sustainability in both countries. It also identifies gaps in ocean monitoring and the need to define targets, as well as the cost of reaching them, which aims to inform ocean management and policies. This preliminary work is an important building block to start conversations on defining shared values of a sustainable ocean and monitor the gap to reach these targets.

How to cite: Carranza, D., Ancog, R., Bonnin, M., Herrmann, M., Lanco, S., Lecuyer, O., Retnoningtyas, H., Rosdiana, A., Sutarto, A., Yulianto, I., and Comte, A.: Adding an aggregate sustainability gap metric to ocean accounting: a Blue ESGAP application in South-East Asia, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-622, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-622, 2025.