T1-2 | Human and non-human rights to a healthy ocean

T1-2

Human and non-human rights to a healthy ocean
Orals
| Fri, 06 Jun, 10:30–12:00 (CEST)|Room 3
Further information on the theme is available at: https://one-ocean-science-2025.org/programme/themes.html#T1

Orals: Fri, 6 Jun, 10:30–12:00 | Room 3

Chairperson: Oliver Ashford
10:30–10:40
|
OOS2025-1
|
ECOP
Elena Pérez Álvaro

In numerous Pacific societies, women are acknowledged as key holders of navigational expertise. They mastered advanced techniques of celestial navigation, relying on the positions of stars, the sun, and the moon, as well as piloting skills that involved interpreting and utilizing local and seasonal weather patterns. Polynesians also had a profound understanding of their surroundings, recognizing plant and animal species unique to particular islands. This knowledge enabled them to predict the type of land they were approaching and gauge its distance. By identifying these biological signs, they could foresee the characteristics of the land ahead and navigate with impressive accuracy. This deep ecological understanding not only guided their voyages but was also vital in managing resources and practicing environmental stewardship.

This presentation will delve into how, as global environmental challenges grow more pressing, incorporating the principles of Ocean diplomacy alongside the rich navigational traditions of Pacific cultures—especially the knowledge and contributions of Indigenous women—can provide a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to addressing environmental security issues on a global scale. By showcasing and integrating these traditional practices and holistic worldviews, this presentation seeks to enhance international strategies, creating solutions that are culturally sensitive and more effective in dealing with environmental conflicts and safeguarding ocean security.

How to cite: Pérez Álvaro, E.: Ocean Diplomacy: Integrating the Navigational Heritage of Polynesian Women into Environmental Security Strategies, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1, 2025.

10:40–10:50
|
OOS2025-945
Tamatoa Bambridge, Paul D'arcy, and Alexander Mawyer

 

This presentation provides an overview of the importance of Indigenous marine areas around the world. Critical to the implementation of several global conservation and climate agreements is the understanding of the scale, location, and conservation values of the oceans over which Indigenous Peoples exercise traditional rights. However, spatial information on Indigenous waters, lagoon and oceans has never been aggregated at a global scale. Thus, using publicly available geospatial resources, we show the importance of Indigenous Peoples’ management or tenure rights over the ocean and various seascapes. It concludes that marine spaces over which Indigenous peoples exercise some degree of management, autonomously or shared, are far more extensive than is generally acknowledged in the literature. The presentation argues that vast geographical extent and ecological variation of marine areas with some degree of Indigenous management, plus the variety of effective, multi-party management regimes contained within such marine managed areas, hold valuable lessons for effective, cooperative marine conservation and restoration. The geospatial analysis presented indicates that strategic collaborative partnerships  would provide significant benefits for the conservation and sustainability of seascapes, marine ecosystems, and the culture of local communities.

How to cite: Bambridge, T., D'arcy, P., and Mawyer, A.: Mapping indigenous seas:  defining and plotting indigenous sovereignty, governance and management in fluid seas, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-945, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-945, 2025.

10:50–11:00
|
OOS2025-981
|
ECOP
|
Georgia Holly, Jon Henderson, Annie Edwards, and Hannah Cocks

This presentation will examine the essential role of marine cultural heritage (MCH) in advancing sustainable ocean practices and strengthening human-ocean relationships. Marine cultural heritage, encompassing everything from historical sites and artifacts to traditional practices and knowledge systems, holds significant potential to inform, inspire, and enrich global efforts toward sustainable development in the ocean space. This session highlights the contributions of the Cultural Heritage Framework Programme (CHFP) within the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030), the only Ocean Decade Programme focussing on cultural heritage, with onus on CHFP’s endorsed projects, including SeaVoice, which demonstrate the power of cultural heritage in fostering sustainable and inclusive ocean governance.

MCH plays a profound role in understanding the complex interconnections between humans and the marine environment. It shapes identities, records histories, and reflects societal developments tied to the ocean. Recognizing the value of MCH can lead to a more nuanced appreciation of marine ecosystems and the importance of their preservation, not only as natural resources but as carriers of collective memory and heritage. This presentation will explore the influence of MCH on identity and community, its impact on ecosystem conservation, and its ability to inspire sustainable practices that respect both environmental and cultural dimensions. CHFP projects serve as practical examples of how integrating cultural heritage within marine science and policy can produce beneficial outcomes for communities and ecosystems alike.

Through case studies from various endorsed projects under CHFP, this session will highlight successful integrations of MCH in marine policy and conservation. For instance, SeaVoice amplifies diverse oceanic narratives, bringing forward voices from coastal and indigenous communities to deepen our understanding of ocean culture. Such projects emphasize the crucial need to view the ocean through multiple lenses—scientific, historical, cultural, and ecological—to build a comprehensive and resilient approach to sustainability. Additionally, this presentation will address the challenges and opportunities in merging MCH with marine policy, offering insights into gaps within current policy frameworks and how they may be improved to protect heritage sites, support local cultures, and enhance marine stewardship.

Another key focus will be the interdisciplinary and innovative approaches needed to strengthen the role of MCH within Ocean Literacy initiatives. By integrating historical perspectives into contemporary dialogues on ocean sustainability, marine archaeology and cultural heritage studies can transform from supplementary fields into core contributors to ocean conservation and policy debates. However, achieving this requires changes in approach and policy support to ensure that MCH is seen as a vital part of the solution, not just a complementary aspect of marine research.

By championing a holistic approach to ocean conservation and governance, this presentation contributes to the broader objectives of the Ocean Decade. The expected outcomes include enhanced awareness of MCH’s value, identification of collaborative actions, and the development of recommendations for integrating MCH into sustainable marine management, setting the foundation for a future where ocean governance is enriched by both natural and cultural heritage considerations.

How to cite: Holly, G., Henderson, J., Edwards, A., and Cocks, H.: Marine Cultural Heritage as a Catalyst for Sustainable Ocean Practices, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-981, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-981, 2025.

11:00–11:10
|
OOS2025-61
Thomas Changeux, Anne-Sophie Tribot, Louise Merquiol, and Daniel Faget

Our communication examines the depiction of aquatic life in art and its significance for understanding human interactions with marine ecosystems over time. Historically, artistic representations have portrayed the ocean as an inexhaustible resource, reflecting societal attitudes towards the environment.

The human connection with aquatic environments is ancient, as evidenced by Neanderthal remains and early depictions of marine species. Greek and Roman arts, with rich mythologies and detailed representations, demonstrate early engagement with marine life. Later, the Renaissance and 17th-century still-life paintings in the Netherlands, Spain, and Italy saw a flourishing of detailed depictions of marine creatures. This shift in artistic focus continued into contemporary art, where representations are less about realism and more about exploring human perceptions and imaginations of the ocean. Such artworks provide insights into how modern societies grapple with environmental degradation and their desire to reconnect with nature.

Our works highlights the growing relevance of environmental history in biodiversity conservation. By examining artworks from different historical periods, we collected valuable data about past ecosystems. For example, depictions of freshwater fish in 17th-century paintings align with observed declines in specific species like sturgeon and salmon. This correlation between artists' regional backgrounds and the species they depicted underscores the reliability of art as a historical record.

We also argue that the sensory and emotional impact of art can evoke strong responses in viewers, connecting them to memories and experiences of nature. This dimension is crucial in fostering respectful relationships with the natural world, yet it is often overlooked in conservation discourse. Initiatives like the collaborative book Merveilles aquatiques, l’art de représenter le vivant aim to bridge art and science, promoting new connections between society and the marine environment.

Ultimately, our communication asserts that art plays a crucial role in raising environmental awareness and shaping human perceptions of marine life. It calls for interdisciplinary collaboration between scientists, artists, and researchers to explore the intersection of aesthetics, history, and ecology in fostering sustainable relationships with the ocean.

How to cite: Changeux, T., Tribot, A.-S., Merquiol, L., and Faget, D.: Aquatic Life in Art: From Historical Perspectives to Modern Conservation, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-61, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-61, 2025.

11:10–11:20
|
OOS2025-1245
Clément Chazot, Pradeep Singh, Raphaelle Flint, Hannah Lily, Holly Niner, Jessica Battle, and Heidi Weiskel

The ocean plays a crucial role in addressing the triple planetary crises of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. It provides essential ecosystem services such as climate regulation, food security for billions, and supports human health, cultural values and wellbeing. The ocean is however facing a possible new threat: deep seabed mining (DSM), an emerging industrial activity that extracts mineral deposits from the deep seabed. Some actors are pushing for rapid development of this industry, with mining potentially starting soon, and likely in the absence of regulations, scientific evidence and social acceptance.

The International Seabed Authority (ISA), which regulates activities in areas beyond national jurisdiction (the “Area”), has only issued exploration contracts with regulations to govern the transition to exploitation under development. Meanwhile, scientific research increasingly shows that DSM could cause significant and irreparable harm to marine biodiversity and ecosystems, with limited knowledge or means available to mitigate such impacts. These effects could, in turn, disrupt essential ecosystem services, threatening human health, wellbeing, and cultural connections.

The multiple impacts of DSM on human rights stemming from the degradation of ecosystem services, including emerging jurisprudence, both internationally and domestically, engages on the following themes:

  • The right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment;
  • The right to benefit from scientific progress;
  • The right to health, and food security;
  • Indigenous rights, including the protection of cultural heritage.

Negative impacts to human rights are also possible via the way in which decisions are made, including issues related to:

  • Access to information, participation in decisions, and justice for environmental matters;
  • Protection of environmental human rights defenders;
  • Children’s rights, such as participation in decisions affecting them and having their best interests considered;
  • Business and human rights, and self-determination;
  • The rights of future generations.

To date, these human rights concerns have been largely overlooked by the ISA and in its regulatory development. Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the Area and its resources are the common heritage of humankind. This means they should be managed for the benefit of all, including through the support of marine scientific research, sharing economic benefits, and ensuring environmental protection.

It is critical for ISA member states to incorporate human rights considerations in their decision making at the ISA. National businesses must also be compelled to respect human rights, with legal consequences if failing to do so. International negotiations at the ISA should be guided by a human rights-based approach, ensuring that decision-making is participatory and inclusive. Safeguards, such as the requirement for free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) from Indigenous Peoples and social legitimacy in the broader sense, must be part of this approach. The ISA must align itself with good practices to safeguard human rights, as seen in other contemporaneous multilateral agreements. Without such safeguards, DSM should not be allowed to commence.

A clean, healthy, and sustainable deep ocean is not only an environmental issue—it is a fundamental human right that must be defended for the benefit of current and future generations.

How to cite: Chazot, C., Singh, P., Flint, R., Lily, H., Niner, H., Battle, J., and Weiskel, H.: Deep seabed mining and how it affects human rights, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1245, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1245, 2025.

11:20–11:30
|
OOS2025-1243
Mekhala Dave, Emma Critchley, and Pradeep Singh

As the world confronts an escalating ocean crisis, the deep sea—often referred to as the "last frontier" of our planet—remains largely remote, detached in human imaginaries and is being optimized for natural resources for a green energy transition at the UN regulatory authority, the International Seabed Authority (ISA) which has the mandate for deep seabed mining governance. 

As the cluster of rights and heritage preservation are far from being fully operationalised at the ISA, this paper makes a legal case for a rights-based framework for the deep sea which offers a transformative approach to ocean stewardship, recognizing not only the ecological significance of these ecosystems but also their intrinsic rights to protection and preservation. This framework challenges conventional, exploitative models of ocean governance, urging a shift towards more inclusive, ethical, and sustainable practices.

At the heart of this paradigm shift is the confluence of diverse knowledge systems. This paper examines from the lens of artistic praxis, indigenous wisdom, and scientific research of cultural significance as well as ethical practices that provide complementary insights that deepen our understanding of the deep sea and its interconnectedness within wider ocean health.  

As the legal rights-based framework for the deep sea is in its infancy, new formats of research investigation — these include artistic methods that blend reflexivity,  embodied encounters, and place-based insights which can help reveal the fragility of the ocean's depths and critically engage in hidden narratives, stirring emotional and cultural connections; and imbibing Indigenous knowledge of ancestral genealogies that offers invaluable perspectives on sustainability and respect for natural resources, while scientific inquiry contributes empirical data and innovative solutions for protection.

This paper focuses on the intersection between policy, knowledge and the role of art in bringing all voices to the decision-making table. The paper will discuss opportunities to establish and implement effective regulatory measures for the protection and conservation of the deep ocean from emerging threats caused by human activities, such as deep seabed mining, including exploring the topic through relations between human and non-human rights. As a case study, the paper will feature a recent initiative that brings together new perspectives through  the co-produced project ‘Rights of the Deep’ (2024) between the UK based artist Emma Critchley, legal experts, Pacific indigenous representatives and scientific advisors which emphasizes the role of art as a catalyst for dialogues on the topic of deep seabed mining and to influence institutional and policy reform at the ISA and beyond. It also expands on other emerging artistic contributions from the collective The Inhabitants, the Tongan artist Latai Tamoepeau and others.  

From the harmonious collaboration between legal experts, Indigenous representatives, and scientists through the lens of art, we can cultivate a transformative evolution in ocean stewardship—one that bridges the fragments of knowledge and nurtures a holistic, reverent connection to the deep sea. This approach emphasizes the need for cultural and ecological sensitivity in protecting our oceans and ensuring their resilience for heritage preservation for future generations.

 

How to cite: Dave, M., Critchley, E., and Singh, P.: The Case for Deep Sea Rights: A Path to Equitable and Sustainable Ocean Stewardship, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1243, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1243, 2025.

11:30–11:40
|
OOS2025-720
Nadine Le Bris, Franca Cibecchini, Denis Dégez, and Vincent Creuze

Deep-sea exploration is recent and its cultural and biodiversity heritage remains largely unknown. Human activities increasingly developing at great depths threaten the richest of these sites, and massive destruction occurs sometimes even before they are discovered and inventoried. Investigating and establishing effective protection measures for deep-sea biodiversity and cultural heritage sites is a critical challenge, requiring urgent and collaborative exploration efforts.

Mutualistic approaches integrating deep-sea biodiversity and archeological investigations hold great potential to support this effort. Underwater archaeology and deep-sea ecology share similar requirements in terms of instrumentation for accessing sites, for observation and sampling at scales ranging from centimetres to tens-of-meters. Furthermore, the investigation of shipwrecks provides unique opportunities for advancing knowledge in terms of spatial and temporal dynamics of deep-sea communities and highlights the potential role of archaeological sites as habitats for protected species, of relevance to conservation strategies and to anthropogenic impact assessments at depth.

Certain priority areas for underwater archaeology exploration, such as historical maritime routes, represent hotspots of this cultural and ecological heritage. This is the case of the Corsica Channel, between the east coast of the island and Italy, where the seabed reaches depths of several hundred meters within a short distance from the coast of Corsica, marked by a narrow shelf and steep margin, in addition to be host a large number of shipwrecks from more than a 2000-year time period. The development of « lightweight » deep-sea robotic technologies has opened access to these depths to explorers and researchers. The Département des Recherches Archéologiques Subaquatiques et Sous-marines (Drassm) of the French Ministry of Culture pioneered this effort through its programme of research and innovation on the deep-sea shipwrecks off-shore Corsica, fostering tight collaboration between archaeologists and roboticists for the development of dedicated instrumentation.

This strategy and these tools are also highly valuable for deep-sea ecological research and biodiversity conservation programs. The development of collaborations between the Drassm and the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris, France), since 2021, has notably provided new information on the distribution of protected taxa, such as scleractinian and gorgonian corals, in this region of the western Mediterranean sea under particular stress from climate disturbance. The data acquired provide insights to the growth rate and favourable habitat conditions of these foundation species and, more broadly, on the diverse fauna hosted by deep-sea shipwrecks, expanding deep-sea ecological knowledge, in alignment with the objectives of protection and conservation in the area (Parc Naturel Marin du Cap Corse et de l’Agriate, Natura 2000 Habitats Directive). This program triggered joined-efforts for the characterisation of settlements on different archaeological sites, their structuring species and associated fauna, using deep-sea imagery. The presentation will illustrate the value of this collaborative effort and its contribution to of the investigation of poorly explored sites, cultural and biological hotspot of unique richness, through different examples, ranging from the Roman-era to World War II shipwrecks.

How to cite: Le Bris, N., Cibecchini, F., Dégez, D., and Creuze, V.: Archaeological heritage and biodiversity hotspots : mutualisation of technological innovation and investigation strategies to improve knowledge and protection in poorly explored deep-sea regions, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-720, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-720, 2025.

11:40–12:00

Posters on site | Poster area "La Baleine"

Display time: Tue, 3 Jun, 17:00–Thu, 5 Jun, 20:00
P23
|
OOS2025-299
Exploring Ocean-related Rights in a Transforming World
(withdrawn)
Lynne Shannon, Elisa Morgera, Hannah Gosnell, Darcy Riddell, Chinwe Ifejika Speranza, Ethan Gordon, Henry Pitts, Sebastian Villasante, and Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito
P25
|
OOS2025-787
|
ECOP
Oliver S. Ashford and the Blue Paper authors

The ocean holds great, though still largely unrecognised and unrealised, potential to improve human health, support mental health and wellbeing, create economic opportunity and advance social justice. Opportunities include: new medicines to fight disease; new materials; inspiration for new technologies to support societal development; new ocean-based energy sources; blue food resources that hold promise for ending hunger and reducing food insecurity; and access to nature to support recreation and promote mental health. However, the ocean’s potential to benefit humanity is threatened by climate change, pollution, biodiversity loss, inequitable and unsustainable patterns of consumption, and marginalisation of Indigenous Peoples, local communities and other coastal populations. These threats are the result of improper ocean governance and driven by a relentless quest for short-term economic gain without concern for human health, natural capital or environmental consequence.

In research commissioned by the Ocean Panel, we argue that fully realising the ocean’s benefits for human health and wellbeing and safeguarding our common future will require confronting these threats by meeting the commitments of global laws, treaties, conventions and guidelines; building global partnerships; and promoting a greater focus on equity and the protection of human rights for all people, including the right to health and a healthy environment.

We identify three actions of overarching importance to both ocean and human health: 1) Collaboratively protect, restore and sustainably manage ocean biodiversity, including by ratifying and implementing key international agreements; 2) Combat climate change and eliminate pollution, including by upholding commitments to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Paris Agreement, the COP 28 and 29 outcomes, and the UN Global Plastics Treaty; and 3) Improve human health and equity measurement by transparently incorporating evidence and linked indicators of both ocean health and human health and wellbeing into relevant policies and decision-making.

Achieving these actions will necessitate empowering marginalised voices and creating a sustainable, more equitable economy that benefits all of humanity. Healthcare professionals and the global health sector are uniquely well positioned to advocate for change, advance equity and promote sustained global action to protect both ocean health and human health. At present are they are underutilised in this capacity.

How to cite: Ashford, O. S. and the Blue Paper authors: How can a healthy ocean improve human health and enhance wellbeing on a rapidly changing planet?, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-787, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-787, 2025.

P26
|
OOS2025-1587
|
ECOP
Ines Carter and Clément Astruc Delor

We propose an interdisciplinary framework combining scientific data and legal theory to enhance environmental protection in the Southern Ocean, focusing on krill fisheries. Through a “legal foresight” exercise, we explore how the outdated “bundle of rights” concept could reshape the economic and ecological value of krill, incorporating ecosystem services and natural capital into the CCAMLR (Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources) management system. This approach aims to address environmental externalities traditionally ignored in marine resource management by recognizing the broader environmental value of krill beyond economic transactions.

Antarctica’s lack of a permanent human population presents unique challenges for legal innovation. While climate litigation elsewhere has leveraged human rights—particularly Indigenous rights—this strategy is less applicable to Antarctica. However, the strong global attachment to Antarctica’s wildlife and landscapes, fosters a form of social capital that could influence international legal obligations, even in the absence of direct human rights claims. This global attachment could be further reinforced through ocean literacy, which, in addition to highlighting iconic wildlife and landscapes, emphasizes the shared knowledge of key services the region provides to humanity. This social capital could drive greater support for more rigorous conservation measures.

This work draws on Elinor Ostrom’s principles for managing common resources: symbolic connections to the region could promote collective stewardship, supporting a more robust conservation ethos. While we do not challenge state sovereignty or existing treaties, we advocate for a closer integration of legal and scientific perspectives to align the CCAMLR and Antarctic Treaty frameworks with modern environmental needs. By incorporating cutting-edge scientific data on krill’s ecological role—such as its contribution to the carbon pump—we suggest that international legal bodies like ITLOS, ICJ, and the WTO could serve as platforms for advancing conservation. Litigation through these bodies could help export commitments made under the CCAMLR to other regimes, reinforcing broader environmental governance.

This work advocates for reconciling legal and scientific approaches to conservation, highlighting the need for more collaborative, flexible strategies to effectively protect the Antarctic ecosystem. While exploratory, our work posits that litigation could play a role in clarifying environmental obligations that political processes may fail to address, providing an alternative path to uphold the Antarctic’s protected status.

Additionally, the unique characteristics of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean are shared with the global ocean, making the region a valuable "legal laboratory" for studying broader marine conservation issues. Lessons drawn from the governance of the Southern Ocean could inform global marine protection strategies, strengthening both legal and scientific frameworks worldwide.

Ultimately, this work offers an innovative thought experiment combining environmental philosophy, legal theory, and scientific data to propose new pathways for conservation in Antarctica. By fostering interdisciplinary dialogue, it aims to enhance our understanding of how legal strategies and scientific advancements can work together to ensure the ongoing protection of the Antarctic ecosystem and inform global ocean governance.

How to cite: Carter, I. and Astruc Delor, C.: The Southern Ocean as a Legal Laboratory: Reviving the Bundle of Rights to Anchor Ecosystem Services in Marine Conservation, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1587, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1587, 2025.

Posters virtual | online

Display time: Tue, 3 Jun, 17:00–Thu, 5 Jun, 20:00
vP7
|
OOS2025-568
|
ECOP
Falguni Tailor, Sharada Channarayapatna, and Chhavi Nath Pandey

Oceans play a vital role in sustaining marine life and human well-being, offering essential ecosystem services, including regulating coastal temperature and rainfall, supporting ecosystems such as the coral reef ecosystem, mangrove ecosystem, and estuarine ecosystem, food production, carbon sequestration, and tourism among others. Numerous marine species depend on healthy ocean ecosystems and their survival is directly influenced by the scale of anthropogenic activities in the region. It is important to study the interconnectedness of humans and non-humans in marine areas to fully appreciate their mutual dependencies and implications for ocean health and sustainability.

Earlier studies have explored human-centric approaches for sustainable management of marine resources, which are beneficial for both people and marine ecosystems. These studies suggest that human-centered frameworks could also enhance the protection of non-humans in the oceans. However, there is a lack of research on this topic specific to India, given its extensive 7,500 km coastline. This underscores the need to investigate the human–non-human–marine area nexus in this part of the world, to support the environmentally sustainable management of its marine regions.

The study addresses this gap by identifying, acknowledging and documenting the contributions of marine non-humans to humans, and how they support the region’s economy, ecology, and communities. It attempts to investigate key indicators playing a critical role in human-marine environment dynamics. While the study emphasizes large marine animals in the human-marine environmental dynamics, it also acknowledges the significance of other marine species, habitats, and ecosystems, including phytoplankton and zooplankton. The study includes systematic literature review considering possible sources of information and stakeholder consultations at various levels. 

The study would result in a guiding framework, highlighting the importance of establishing institutional structures addressing the human–non-human–marine area nexus. At its nascent stage, it offers strategic recommendations aimed at safeguarding human rights in coastal areas while simultaneously protecting and conserving marine biodiversity. This framework can serve as a valuable reference for policymakers and researchers who are seeking effective measures and inclusive approaches for better marine resource management and marine ecosystem governance.

How to cite: Tailor, F., Channarayapatna, S., and Pandey, C. N.: A conceptual framework to assess the dynamics of human–non-human–marine areas in India during Anthropocene: A case study of Odisha, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-568, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-568, 2025.

vP8
|
OOS2025-629
|
ECOP
Gridanya Mega Laidha and Ghina Raihanah Tadjoedin

Sasi, an indigenous conservation practice in Indonesia, is a means to address the triple planetary crisis—climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. Sasi involves the temporary restriction of exploitation within specific geographic areas or for certain species, thereby allowing natural resources the necessary time and space to regenerate. Such approaches harmonizes the interests of human and non-human beings. This paper will argue that the current mainstream conservation framework is insufficient to effectively address the multifaceted challenges of the planetary crisis. To substantiate this argument, we apply four foundational ecological principles—ecological integrity, limits, primacy and justice—as a lens through which to assess whether indigenous practices like Sasi provide viable solutions. This analysis is informed by three complementary methodologies: first, a comparative examination of the concept of law in the Anthropocene; second, field research conducted in two regions of Maluku, Haruku and Aru Island, where Sasi is actively practiced; and third, expert discussions to contextualize indigenous conservation from an academic perspective. Our findings suggest that Sasi aligns closely with the four ecological principles. Sasi plays an important role in maintaining ecological integrity and limits by limiting resource exploitation in certain areas, allowing for natural regeneration of marine and terrestrial ecosystems. The temporary prohibition of use in Sasi shows the commitment of indigenous peoples to place the preservation of nature as a primacy, beyond current needs, in order to ensure a healthy and sustainable environment for future generations. Ecological justice is manifested in Sasi’s equitable distribution of resources, ensuring that both current and future generations benefit from sustainable practices. Ultimately, this paper will look at local, national, and international legal instruments that provide space for the integration of understandings of ecological integrity, limits, primacy and justice as found in Sasi, and identify best practices in existing legal instruments. The aim is to strengthen and adopt indigenous conservation practices like Sasi to be considered integral to addressing the pressing challenges of the planetary crisis.

How to cite: Laidha, G. M. and Tadjoedin, G. R.: A New Path for Conservation: The Role of Sasi as Indigenous Traditions in Addressing the Triple Planetary Crisis, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-629, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-629, 2025.