T8-3 | Impacts of plastic pollution on human well-being and marine ecosystems

T8-3

Impacts of plastic pollution on human well-being and marine ecosystems
Orals
| Tue, 03 Jun, 16:00–17:30 (CEST)|Room 7
Orals |
Tue, 16:00
Further information on the theme is available at: https://one-ocean-science-2025.org/programme/themes.html#T8

Orals: Tue, 3 Jun, 16:00–17:30 | Room 7

Chairperson: Georg Hanke
16:00–16:10
|
OOS2025-198
|
ECOP
|
Théo Segur and Jeroen Sonke

The Mediterranean Sea is pressured by numerous anthropic factors, among which plastic pollution raises serious concerns for ecosystems and human health. In this study, an environmental plastics mass budget is proposed for the Mediterranean region based on recent observations, allowing the formulation of a first order plastics cycle box-model that simulates plastics dispersal and fragmentation in the land-ocean-atmosphere system. We use this model to explore different OECD plastic production and waste management policy scenarios toward the end of the 21st century. We find that the current Mediterranean marine plastic stock (sea surface, water column, sandy beach and sediments) of 7 million metric tons (Mt) (median, IQR 3-13 Mt) in 2015 constraints continental plastic runoff to 0.44 Mt y-1 (0.20-0.82 Mt y-1). The total marine plastics stock would increase 9-fold by 2060 under a business-as-usual scenario, reaching 60 Mt (29-100 Mt). Implementation of the OECD Global Ambition scenario would lower this stock to 49 Mt (25-81 Mt) by 2060. Most of the plastic runoff from land to sea is attributed to the Northern Africa and Middle-East modelled region, with 0.34 Mt y-1 (78%). This indicates that efforts to implement efficient collecting and treatment systems should focus on these regions. About 1.4% of all the plastic waste generated in the Mediterranean Sea catchment between 1950 and 2015 reached the marine environment, meaning that most of the plastic waste generated is still terrestrial (362 Mt, 76%). Moreover, in the marine environment, most of the plastic mass is concentrated in the shelf sediments (5 Mt, 76%), which are fragile ecosystems that host most of the Mediterranean Sea biodiversity, making downstream plastic unrealistic to clean up. Terrestrial remediation of legacy plastic pool could reduce total plastic runoff from land to sea by half of the current value toward the end of the 21st century.

How to cite: Segur, T. and Sonke, J.: Plastic pollution outlook in the mediterranean sea: a box-model approach based on OECD policy scenarios., One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-198, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-198, 2025.

16:10–16:20
|
OOS2025-1377
|
Georg Hanke, Luis Ruiz-Orejon, Dennis Walvoort, and Willem van Loon

Policy measures against marine litter aim at reducing litter (including plastics) concentrations in the environment, in order to mitigate impact on marine ecosystems and human activities. Environmental concentrations of plastics/litter are being considered as proxies for related impact and risk.

In that context, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) requires that Good Environmental Status (GES) be achieved for the European marine environment, including for marine litter, as per MSFD Descriptor 10. Based on a commonly agreed methodology, through Guidance on the Monitoring of Marine Litter, EU Member States have been providing data on macro litter abundances on selected EU beaches to the European Marine Observation and Data Network (EMODnet). Following the establishment of a baseline period, 2015–2016, and further ongoing data collection, data from 253 beaches across EU were analysed and normalised by the MSFD Technical Group on Marine Litter (TG ML).

The methodology for step-trend assessment was then discussed, agreed upon and applied to the dataset from 2015 to 2021. The trends of litter abundance for total abundance and selected litter categories at different spatial aggregation levels will be presented. Despite the encouraging trends showing the positive impacts of mitigation measures through EU legislation, regional and national efforts, and efforts by the public, the abundance of litter in many European areas remains high and demands the implementation of additional effective measures. While the approach was applied to data from EU countries it can be applied in shared marine basins and also at larger spatial scope to inform on trends related to impact and risk posed my by marine litter/plastic.

How to cite: Hanke, G., Ruiz-Orejon, L., Walvoort, D., and van Loon, W.: Large scale trends of coastline litter including plastic as a proxy for impact mitigation in EU, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1377, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1377, 2025.

16:20–16:30
|
OOS2025-642
Amandine Caruana, Vincent Lapinte, Laurine Maurici, Xavier Cousin, Marie-Laure Bégout, Elise Evrard, Véronique Savar, Fabienne Hervé, Mohamed Laabir, Zouher Amzil, and Estelle Masseret

The combination of the two pollutants, plastics (physico-chemical and anthropogenic) and phycotoxins (natural biologic toxins from microalgae), that are present in most of the coastlines worldwide is a new risk for marine ecosystem that needs to be investigated with respect to marine ecosystem and human health. In this study, we investigated (i) the adhesion behavior of benthic (Vulcanodinium rugosum) and pelagic (Alexandrium pacificum) toxic microalgae present on the Mediterranean coast on two types of macroplastics, (ii) the risk of phycotoxins (lipophilic pinnatoxin G and portimine A produced by V. rugosum and hydrophilic saxitoxins by A. pacificum) adsorption on the same macroplastics. To evaluate the role of additives in this process, we used PVC after addition of either the petrochemical-derived phthalate or a biosourced additive as plasticizers. Results showed that laboratory cultures of V. rugosum and A. pacificum with strips of PVC with the biosourced additive rapidly declined in growth and photosynthetic activity. PVC with the biosourced additive enables senescent algal cells to adhere but the risk of dissemination seems limited due its deleterious effect. PVC-DEHP strips showed no or limited impact on algal growth and did not allow algal cell adhesion. Regarding phycotoxins, saxitoxins do not adsorb on PVC while portimine and pinnatoxin adsorb on PVC with higher affinity to PVC with the biosourced additive. These results highlight the risk of phycotoxin-contaminated plastics in coastal marine environment.

How to cite: Caruana, A., Lapinte, V., Maurici, L., Cousin, X., Bégout, M.-L., Evrard, E., Savar, V., Hervé, F., Laabir, M., Amzil, Z., and Masseret, E.: Role of plastics (polymer and plasticizer) as vectors of harmful algae and their toxins: study case of the toxic dinoflagellates Vulcanodinium rugosum and Alexandrium pacificum , One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-642, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-642, 2025.

16:30–16:40
|
OOS2025-1188
|
ECOP
Charlotte Lefebvre, Edgar Dusacre, Nagore González-Soto, Bénédicte Morin, Christelle Clerandeau, Sophie Lecomte, Miren P. Cajaraville, and Jérôme Cachot

All oceans are contaminated by plastics that are displaying various shapes, sizes or polymer type. Several sectors of activity can contribute to this pollution and the fishing sector is one of them. However, the toxicity of degradation products of fishing nets (FNs) to aquatic organisms remains scarcely studied to date, especially when weathered. In this study, we analyzed the degradation of environmentally weathered FNs and the toxicity of their leachates. Six different fishing nets made of polyamide 6 (PAØ33, PAØ35, PAØ95), poly-butylene-succinate-co-butyrate-co-adipate-co-terephthalate (PBSØ35, PBSØ60) and co-high-performance-polyethylene-polypropylene (HPPEØ4.25) were selected. FNs were weathered in the harbors of Arcachon (New Aquitaine, France) and Pasaia (Basque Country, Spain) during 0, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (named hereafter T0, T1, T3, T6 and T12, respectively). The leaching of FNs was done over 24h in deionized water at 190 rpm. The toxicity of FN leachates was tested on the marine bacteria Aliivibrio fischeri and the fish Oryzias latipes at larval stage. Different endpoints were analyzed such as the inhibition of the bioluminescence for the marine bacteria, and the mortality, swimming ability and changes in the behavior for the fish larvae.

Overall, results on bacteria showed that between 0 and 78% of the bioluminescence was inhibited by FN leachates. At Arcachon, leachates of PAØ35, PAØ95 and PBSØ60 showed a higher toxicity at T3 compared to T6. Then at T12, all leachates (except for PBSØ60) showed a higher toxicity compared to T6. Regarding Pasaia harbor, the PBSØ60 leachate showed a decreasing toxicity between T0 and T1. Leachates of PAØ35, PAØ33 and HPPEØ4.25 showed a higher toxicity at T3 compared to T1 and T6, while the same samples showed a higher toxicity at T12 compared to T6. The non-linear kinetics of the toxicity of FN leachates could be due to complex interactions with the surrounding environment. Indeed, plastics can adsorb or desorb pollutants from and into the marine environment. As such, the higher toxicity at T3 and T12 could be related to the sorption of pollutants from the surrounding water and the lower toxicity at T6 may be due to the desorption of FN additives or pollutants. Nevertheless, the toxicity of FN leachates can also be influenced by other factors like the presence of a biofilm and the aging of the FN.

The toxicity kinetics of samples collected at T3 and T12 on fish larvae will also be discussed. Preliminary results show that there were no effects on spinal deformations and swimming ability for all FN leachates. The leachate of PAØ95 from Arcachon showed a slightly higher mortality at T12 compared to T3. However, all other leachates did not show any effect on the mortality of fish larvae. Nevertheless, the analysis of fish behavior will provide additional results in order to discuss the potential sub-lethality of these samples.

 

*Project funded by PNM-BA, the French Water Agency Adour-Garonne, the Spanish MCIU (FIERA project PID2021- 128600OB-I00), the Basque Government (consolidated research group IT1743-22 and postdoc to NGS), and Euskampus Fundazioa (PLASFITO project and the Laboratory for Transboder Cooperation LTC AquEus).

How to cite: Lefebvre, C., Dusacre, E., González-Soto, N., Morin, B., Clerandeau, C., Lecomte, S., Cajaraville, M. P., and Cachot, J.: Ecotoxicity of fishing nets leachates after up to one year of in situ weathering in two harbors of the Bay of Biscay, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1188, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1188, 2025.

16:40–16:50
|
OOS2025-1439
|
ECOP
Alexandre M. Schonemann, Raquel Abad, and Ricardo Beiras

The risk plastic pollution poses to organisms depends on multiple factors such as particle size and additive composition. In some cases, additives account for up to 30% by weight, and it is well known that some of these additives generate adverse effects on organisms. Bisphenol A (BPA) is a widely used synthetic chemical found in various industries, including plastic. It is prevalent in aquatic environments, with concentrations reaching over 10 μg L⁻¹, and is recognized as a weak estrogenic endocrine disruptor (eEDC). BPA has been identified as a substance of concern due to its reproductive toxicity and has been added to the European Union's "Candidate List" for possible regulation under the REACH framework.

The primary stablished mode of action of BPA is its binding to nuclear estrogen receptors, affecting the transcription of estrogen-responsive genes. However, its effects vary among species, often causing mild or inconsistent outcomes, which complicates regulatory measures.

In vertebrates, BPA is primarily metabolized in the liver by the enzyme uridyl glucuronyl transferase (UGT). However, under specific conditions, UGT availability may be compromised, activating alternative secondary pathways. One such pathway involves the CYP450 enzyme, leading to the formation of the metabolite MBP. We have tested the estrogenic effects of MBP in the marine fish Cyprinodon variegatus, demonstrating elevated estrogenicity at both protein and gene expression levels, and have explored approaches to simulate in vivo scenarios of UGT deficiency.

How to cite: Schonemann, A. M., Abad, R., and Beiras, R.: Metabolic activation of the plastic additive BPA, underlying mode of action, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1439, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1439, 2025.

16:50–17:00
|
OOS2025-1381
Thora Herrmann, Élise Lépy, Apostolos Papakonstantinou, Natascha Oppelt, Victor Lion, Christine Liang, Barbara Jóźwiak, Adam Nawrot, Mélanie Mobley, and Muriel Mercier-Bonin

Marine plastic pollution poses significant risks to ecosystems and human health, particularly in vulnerable Arctic regions. Therefore, assessing the extent and impacts of plastic contamination in these regions through a One Health framework is essential for developing strategies to build resilience in Arctic populations and ecosystems. The Horizon Europe ICEBERG Project addresses these challenges at the ocean-coast-land continuum, working in partnership with Indigenous peoples and local communities in south Greenland, northwest Iceland, and in Svalbard. ICEBERG integrates technology-enhanced community monitoring, such as drones and time-lapse cameras, with manual beach clean-ups for marine litter, citizen science and interactive data-sharing platforms. Researchers, local communities and civil society map pollution hotspots, trace sources, and assess ecological and health impacts of macro, micro-, nanoplastics. This community-driven data collection, supported by both low-tech and advanced technologies, offers a replicable model for tracking marine plastic pollution, studying its impacts and informing local policies to mitigate its effects. ICEBERG's multidisciplinary, multi-stakeholder approach offers valuable insights into the impacts of plastic pollution in Arctic socio-ecological systems and emphasizes the need for sustainable, inclusive, and data-driven environmental management in polar regions.

 

How to cite: Herrmann, T., Lépy, É., Papakonstantinou, A., Oppelt, N., Lion, V., Liang, C., Jóźwiak, B., Nawrot, A., Mobley, M., and Mercier-Bonin, M.: From coast to community: assessing marine plastic pollution impacts on ecosystems and human health in Iceland, Greenland and Svalbard through a One Health and technology-enhanced community monitoring approaches, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1381, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1381, 2025.

17:00–17:10
|
OOS2025-1535
Guillaume Marchessaux, Vincent Marco Just, Mathieu Leborgne, Oumayma Chkili, and Cristèle Chevalier

Managing plastic pollution is a major public health issue in Mayotte (french territory in the Indian ocean), where unauthorized dumps are on the increase. The lack of selective sorting and appropriate practices among residents contributes to this problem. A survey carried out in 2023 among 352 people, survey performed in collaboration with the secondary schools students, highlighted several aspects. Residents show a strong cultural and social attachment to natural spaces, particularly rivers, which they use for a variety of activities, such as washing up or washing dishes. However, river use is also a source of pollution, particularly from plastic waste, which ends up being transported by rivers or the sea. The most common types of plastic are bottles, bags and shoes. Although 81% of respondents consider plastic to be a pollutant, there is a lack of clear social representation on the subject. The lack of sorting facilities and the inefficiency of local infrastructures exacerbate the situation, leading to an accumulation of litter. Waste not only impacts the local environment, such as mangroves, but also disrupts the quality of life of local residents, particularly those living in precarious conditions. This study is the first study highlighting and quantifiying the plastic/waste pollution in Mayotte.

How to cite: Marchessaux, G., Marco Just, V., Leborgne, M., Chkili, O., and Chevalier, C.: Social representation of waste management in Mayotte: a cooperation between residents and scientists , One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1535, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1535, 2025.

17:10–17:30

Posters on site | Poster area "La Baleine"

Display time: Tue, 3 Jun, 17:00–Thu, 5 Jun, 20:00
P534
|
OOS2025-171
|
ECOP
Mohamed Keznine

Plastic pollution and the resulting entanglement of marine wildlife is a global and growing issue. However, there is a significant lack of knowledge about the impacts of marine litter on marine biodiversity in Morocco. Based on a digital media search, we evaluated the negative impacts of marine litter on Moroccan marine biodiversity. The study demonstrated that sixty-eight individuals from 18 species were affected by marine litter. Cetaceans are most affected by entanglements, followed by sea turtles, fish, seabirds and elasmobranchs. Most of the reported entanglements were from discarded or lost fishing gear, indicating the importance of strengthening existing legislation for the protection of endangered marine animals and implementing mitigation measures related to discarded fishing litter. This study is the first inventory of marine wildlife affected by marine litter in Morocco, but the real status stays underestimated and still somewhat unclear.

How to cite: Keznine, M.: The impacts of abandoned, discarded and lost fishing gear on marine biodiversity in Morocco, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-171, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-171, 2025.

P535
|
OOS2025-223
|
ECOP
Abraham Ekperusi, Goodluck Marcus, and Precious Kele

This study investigated the end-of-life fishing gear disposal methods in coastal communities and the implications on the blue economy in the Gulf of Guinea. We adopted questionnaires and focus group discussions for data collection among artisanal fishers. Females dominated the group compared to males, with most fishers within the age bracket of 41-50 years. Over one-third of the fishers had secondary education. The common disposal practices for damaged and end-of-life fishing gear include indiscriminate disposal in the terrestrial and aquatic environment, as well as burning and repurposing for domestic uses. Most fishers (92%) are unaware of the environmental consequences of improper gear disposal, indicating a severe lack of environmental education and the ecological implications of improper fishing gear disposal. Fishing gear destruction (90%), loss (60%) and gear entanglement are prevalent among fishers. Factors responsible for gear destruction and loss include barge operations (54.8%), strong tides (29%), large vessels (9.7%) and speedboats (7.5%). The main items entangling fishing gear include plastic bags, clothes, ghost gear and wood. Preventive measures undertaken by fishers include river lights and the attachment of coloured floaters as a signal to barges, vessels, and speedboats. Additional efforts include the use of strong ropes to avoid the cutting of nets. The study recommends implementing sustainable solutions, such as establishing gear recycling programmes, promoting biodegradable materials, and introducing reforms to incentivize fishers towards proper disposal practices for end-of-life fishing gears. Furthermore, education and community outreach are essential to increasing awareness and engagement in sustainable waste management.

How to cite: Ekperusi, A., Marcus, G., and Kele, P.: Assessing the Disposal Methods for End-of-Life Fishing Gears in Coastal Communities in Nigeria and its Implications on the Blue Economy, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-223, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-223, 2025.

P536
|
OOS2025-231
Hirohiti Raapoto, Keitapu Maamaatuaiahutapu, and Mainui Tanetoa

The drifting Fish Aggregating Devices (dFADs) are fishing gears that are not used by fishermen in French Polynesia which Exclusie Econimic Zone (EEZ) occupies an area of about 5 million square kilometer. More and more dFADs from foreign purse seiner vessels are found in French Polynesia EEZ as reported by fishermen. Some of them drift through the area and leave the EEZ but some of them strand on islands before damaging the coral reef and may be introducing new species collected during their journey. After an attempt to count the stranded dFADs on some islands, we realize that it is too costly and time consuming, if we have to do the counting on the 118 islands. We proposed here to apply a lagrangian model to follow the drifts of artificial dFADS in order to estimate the number of dFADs that would reach the islands. Because the appendages of the dFADs have various length, three simulations were performed with three velocity fields. Statistics regarding the number of dFADs entering French Polynesia EEZ as well as the number of dFADs stranded on islands are estimated. Most of the stranded dFADs are found in the Tuamotu archipelago for all simulations but with varying numbers. The number of stranded dFADs in the Marquesas archipelago varies considerably between the three simulations while very few changes are observed for the Society and Austral archipelagoes. The impacts of dFADS on the local fishery and on the island environment will be discussed.

How to cite: Raapoto, H., Maamaatuaiahutapu, K., and Tanetoa, M.: Drifting Fish Aggregating Devices entering French Polynesia EEZ a modelling approach, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-231, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-231, 2025.

P537
|
OOS2025-672
The new Marine Stewardship Council requirements to improve ghost gear management
(withdrawn)
Beth Polidoro, Shaun McLennan, Tim Huntington, Rod Cappell, Victor Restrepo, Karin Mundnich, and Ernesto Jardim
P538
|
OOS2025-741
|
ECOP
Isabel Jalon-Rojas, Jacques Franco, Vania Ruiz-González, Edgar Dusacre, Miren P. Cajaraville, and Jérôme Cachot

Understanding the pathways of fishing gear in the ocean is essential for effective management and mitigation, yet remains challenging due to the complex interaction of ocean currents, diverse debris sources, types, and environmental factors. The Southern Bay of Biscay, a dynamic marine ecosystem supporting key economic activities like fishing, serves as an ideal case study for exploring these pathways. This study combines process-based numerical modeling and observational data of fishing activity and beached litter to assess the movement of fishing debris, providing insights into its origin, dispersal patterns, and fate. We used MARS-3D hydrodynamic model outputs as ocean-forcing inputs for the Lagrangian particle tracking model TrackMPD. Data on fishing gear deposited along eight beaches, combined with fishing activity records, were used to retrospectively and prospectively estimate the trajectories of floating litter (e.g., net fragments from trawler repairs and losses at sea) and settling litter (e.g., fibers from the fragmentation and degradation of set gillnets), and establish source-to-sink relationships under winter and summer conditions in 2023. Retrospective simulations indicated that, during summer, particles washed up on the beaches of the Spanish Basque Country followed similar pathways, originating from the western Bay of Biscay and offshore the Gironde estuary. Plastics along the French coast sourced from nearby estuarine and coastal systems. In winter, strong surface currents from the far western Bay of Biscay emerged as the main drivers of washed-up particles along the coast. Prospective simulations identified the Arcachon Bay area as a main hotspot of litter from fishing activity in winter. In summer, this zone remained affected, with additional accumulation observed along the eastern shoreline of the Spanish Basque Country. Simulations of sinking fibers suggest that they stayed within the shelf region, although ongoing simulations of different resuspension scenarios will further clarify their potential for remobilization and transport under varying seasonal hydrodynamic conditions. These findings provide valuable insights into the transboundary movement and fate of ocean plastic pollution, highlighting the interconnectedness of coastal regions and the challenges of mitigating pollution across national boundaries.

 

* Funded by PNM-BA, the French Water Agency Adour-Garonne, the Nouvelle Aquitaine Region, the French OFB, the Spanish MCIU (FIERA project PID2021- 128600OB-I00), the Basque Government (consolidated research group IT1743-22) and Euskampus Fundazioa (PLASFITO project and the Laboratory for Transboder Cooperation LTC AquEus).

How to cite: Jalon-Rojas, I., Franco, J., Ruiz-González, V., Dusacre, E., Cajaraville, M. P., and Cachot, J.: The Journey of Fishing Gear in the Southern Bay of Biscay: From Source to Sink and Vice Versa, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-741, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-741, 2025.

P539
|
OOS2025-808
Sandra Ramos, Marisa Almeida, Diana Viegas, and Lisa Sousa and the NETTAG+ project consortium

Every year, tons of fishing gear are discarded to the ocean globally, inflicting severe threats to marine habitats and wildlife, while causing economic damage to the fishing sector. The timely tracking and recovery of lost fishing gear can minimize this risk, help preserve our oceans and boost the fishing sector. Modern fishing gear, primarily composed of non-biodegradable plastics, if abandoned, lost or discarded (ALDFG) persist in marine environments, and contribute to marine pollution, with several harmful impacts, such as ghost fishing, habitat degradation, and microplastic release. In this presentation we will explain how the NETTAG+ project, aligned with SDG 14.1, the NETTAG+ is developing innovative, sustainable solutions to manage and mitigate the adverse effects of abandoned, lost, or discarded fishing gear (ALDFG). In collaboration with the fishing industry, scientists, and NGOs, NETTAG+ focuses on three core areas: i) preventing marine litter derived from fisheries, organizing several awareness actions from fishers to fishers; ii) avoiding the loss of fishing gear, through the development of technology for fishing gear location with acoustic tags; and iii) mitigating the existing ALDFG by development of technology for detection and removal of ALDFG. These solutions collectively aim to reduce the release of microplastics and harmful chemicals in marine ecosystems, while minimizing the occurrence and impact of ghost gear through advanced tracking and retrieval technologies. The NETTAG+ project follows the approach “from fishers to fishers”, where fishers associations/representatives, which are partners of the Consortium, are organizing awareness activities for their associates to promote best practices regarding litter management fostering the prevention of litter produced by the fisheries sector. Moreover, fishers are actively involved in the development of the solutions, including the technological solutions. This collaboration fosters ownership and enhances the likelihood of influencing behavioural changes among fishers, ultimately facilitating the achievement of our project objectives. Through the active involvement of fishing communities, NETTAG+ project strives to transform the role of the fishing sector in environmental preservation, empowering fishers to take proactive responsibility in combating marine pollution. This paradigm shift recognizes fishers as essential stewards of sustainable marine practices, contributing to a cleaner, more resilient Ocean in line with the global conservation goals.

How to cite: Ramos, S., Almeida, M., Viegas, D., and Sousa, L. and the NETTAG+ project consortium: Empowering fishers to tackle marine pollution: NETTAG+ solutions, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-808, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-808, 2025.

P540
|
OOS2025-1392
Diana Viegas, Alfredo Martins, Jeff Neasham, Sandra Ramos, and Marisa Almeida

Abandoned, Lost, or otherwise Discarded Fishing Gear (ALDFG) has a great impact on marine ecosystems. This is not only due to the direct contribution to marine litter production with particular emphasis on plastics but also to the effects of ghost fishing.

The Nettag+ project aims to reduce these impacts by acting on three main lines of action: prevention, avoidance, and mitigation. In the first line, direct action and collaboration with fishers and nature protection organizations around Europe aim to establish the fishermen community as guardians of the ocean. These actions with active fishers' collaboration range from training and dissemination activities related to marine litter and ocean protection to direct measures in day-to-day work to minimize and recover litter from the sea.

In the prevention line, an acoustic tag designed explicitly for the location of ALDFG was developed in collaboration with research institutions and fishing gear manufacturers. It can be integrated into the fishing equipment for future tracking and recovery. This tool can reduce lost fishing gear retrieval costs and is complemented with robotic solutions to support retrieving operations.

To mitigate the effects of existing untagged ALDFG, multisensorial  detection algorithms are being developed to detect and map ALDFG on the sea and to take advantage of autonomous and robotic systems to perform this task.

How to cite: Viegas, D., Martins, A., Neasham, J., Ramos, S., and Almeida, M.: NETTAG+ - Towards a cleaner fishing practice and reducing the environmental impact of lost fishing gear, One Ocean Science Congress 2025, Nice, France, 3–6 Jun 2025, OOS2025-1392, https://doi.org/10.5194/oos2025-1392, 2025.