WBF2026-351, updated on 10 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/wbf2026-351
World Biodiversity Forum 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 17 Jun, 17:00–17:15 (CEST)| Room Dischma
Small habitat patches are the largest contributors to urban biodiversity across taxonomic groups 
Kilian Perrelet1,2,3, Lauren M. Cook1, Florian Altermatt2,4, Federico Riva5, and Marco Moretti3
Kilian Perrelet et al.
  • 1Department of Urban Water Management, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science & Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf, Switzerland
  • 2Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 3Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forests, Snow, and Landscapes (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland
  • 4Department of Aquatic Ecology, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science & Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf, Switzerland
  • 5Institute of Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

As cities densify, green spaces play an increasingly critical role in sustaining urban biodiversity. Yet the relative contribution of habitat patches of varying size, connectivity, and quality has typically been assessed at the patch level, overlooking how these factors shape biodiversity at the landscape scale. Using a decade of monitoring data for invertebrates, vertebrates, and trees across 452 habitat patches in Zurich, Switzerland, we examined how patch area and environmental conditions shape alpha, beta, and gamma diversity. We found that larger patches harbored higher alpha diversity, consistent with the species-area relationship, but also that small patches disproportionately contributed to beta diversity by promoting community turnover. Further analyses also indicated that, per unit area, groups of small patches often supported higher gamma diversity than a few large ones, particularly for trees and invertebrates. Generalized dissimilarity models futher revealed that patch area was a consistent predictor of community composition, not solely via richness effects but through interactions with environmental conditions—including vegetation complexity, water availability, impervious cover, and connectivity to forested habitats. These drivers produced broadly parallel compositional gradients across taxa, with large peri-urban patches hosting more homogeneous and compositionally stable communities, and small inner-city patches supporting distinct, environmentally heterogeneous assemblages. Taxon-specific patterns also emerged: horticultural practices strongly structured tree communities, while invertebrates responded most strongly to landscape-scale factors and vertebrates to local habitat conditions. Collectively, our findings challenge prevailing assumptions in urban planning that prioritize only large patches, showing that even very small green spaces (<1 ha) make essential contributions to gamma diversity and maintain unique biological assemblages. Although small patches do not substitute for habitat loss, they retain high ecological value and can act as stepping stones that facilitate regional persistence. Maintaining a diversity of patch sizes and environmental conditions will therefore be critical for conserving multi-taxon biodiversity in urban landscapes.

How to cite: Perrelet, K., Cook, L. M., Altermatt, F., Riva, F., and Moretti, M.: Small habitat patches are the largest contributors to urban biodiversity across taxonomic groups , World Biodiversity Forum 2026, Davos, Switzerland, 14–19 Jun 2026, WBF2026-351, https://doi.org/10.5194/wbf2026-351, 2026.