WBF2026-427, updated on 10 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/wbf2026-427
World Biodiversity Forum 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 17 Jun, 13:00–14:30 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 17 Jun, 08:30–Thursday, 18 Jun, 18:00|
The Challenge of Internal Nature “Pricing": Guidance for Starting Corporate Natural Capital Accounting
James Pittman1 and Karl Burkhart2
James Pittman and Karl Burkhart
  • 1Real Value Group, United States of America (james@realvalue.group)
  • 2One Earth, Nature Data Lab, United States of America

Nature underpins value in global economic activity, yet its decline continues even as trillions in annual ecosystem-service value and accelerating losses in the most sensitive ecosystems remain largely unrecognized in financial decision-making. Corporate natural capital accounting (CNCA) offers a pathway to correct this omission by translating nature-related dependencies, impacts, and risks into decision-ready information.

Structured guidance exists through the Natural Capital Protocol, the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures, the Science Based Targets for Nature, and related frameworks, yet these tools are highly complex, technically demanding, time-consuming, and difficult to apply consistently across corporations of all sizes and in all sectors. The methodological complexity and technical difficulty underscore the need for an accessible entry pathway that enables companies to begin internalizing ecological value even before comprehensive biophysical accounting is feasible.

A rapid-entry solution is proposed through shadow-pricing approaches that include an internal “Earth Fee” mechanism allocating a proportional share of annual global nature-value loss to corporate revenues. This creates an interim financial signal that supports early mitigation budgeting and resource allocation while avoiding assumptions of full substitutability or valuation precision. The urgency of action is far greater than the time available for complete analysis, making simplified methods essential for identifying mitigation opportunities, evaluating tradeoffs, and directing resources to the most urgent areas of change even before full TNFD- or SBTN-aligned assessments are complete or operational.

The conceptual foundation for this approach draws on the distinction between weak and strong sustainability, emphasizing why non-substitutable natural capital and ecological thresholds must serve as constraints on business strategy. This framing strengthens the case for precautionary action and clarifies why companies should integrate simplified valuation mechanisms while more comprehensive accounting systems mature.

Valuation evidence and examples of corporate application in practice illustrate how CNCA, supported initially by rapid valuation methods and eventually by threshold-aligned, strong-sustainability accounting, can help companies and financial institutions confront rising physical, transition, and systemic nature-related risks. Embedding natural capital considerations within core finance functions is essential for reducing exposure, strengthening long-term value creation, and contributing meaningfully to a nature-positive global economy.

How to cite: Pittman, J. and Burkhart, K.: The Challenge of Internal Nature “Pricing": Guidance for Starting Corporate Natural Capital Accounting, World Biodiversity Forum 2026, Davos, Switzerland, 14–19 Jun 2026, WBF2026-427, https://doi.org/10.5194/wbf2026-427, 2026.