WBF2026-578, updated on 10 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/wbf2026-578
World Biodiversity Forum 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 15 Jun, 16:15–16:30 (CEST)| Room Seehorn
Linking pluriversal worldviews with land use practice: early insights from the Pluriverse Project
Christoph Rupprecht1,8, Melissa Ingaruca Moreno8, Manami Yamashita1,8, Yoshiko Honda1,8, Yi Wang2,8, Mari Nakayama3,8, Layna Droz4,8, Anastasia Battani5,8, Steven McGreevy6,8, Kazuhiko Ota7,8, and Norie Tamura8,9
Christoph Rupprecht et al.
  • 1Faculty of Collaborative Regional Innovation, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan (rupprecht.christoph.bq@ehime-u.ac.jp)
  • 2Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
  • 3Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
  • 4Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • 5Doctoral School in Project Cultures, Iuav University of Venice, Venice, Italy
  • 6Department of Governance and Technology for Sustainability, University of Twente, Twente, Netherlands
  • 7Faculty of Policy Studies, Nanzan University, Nagoya, Japan
  • 8Pluriverse Project, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan
  • 9The Graduate School of Project Design, Osaka, Japan

Worldviews can be understood as a set of assumptions that provide a way of thinking about the basic constitution of reality and of relating to the world. As such, they may shape how we value and relate to nature. Here, we present a multidimensional framework designed to understand why and how the worldviews behind cases/projects affect their engagement in land use practices with relational or pluriversal (Escobar) characteristics. Across ontological, epistemological and praxeological aspects — ways of being in, knowing, and doing in the land — the framework seeks to identify how a worldview is reflected in the relationship to the land through concrete manifestations. These manifestations serve as end points of a spectrum ranging from an anthropocentric, dualistic and mechanical “One-World World” view and world views centered around pluriversal, multispecies and relational values. Concretely, we ask: 1) How is land viewed in the case/project: as object or subject, passive or with agency, resource of medium of communing, of instrumental or intrinsic value?, 2) How is land-related knowledge viewed, structured and produced: restricted to humans or more-than-human, limited to Western epistemology or embracing epistemic pluralism, centered on abstract/rationalized knowing or bodily, multi-sensorial knowing?, and 3) How is land treated, interacted with, and shaped: as property or with multispecies claims, exploited or cared for through stewardship, homogenized or heterogenized? We then showcase early insights from the Pluriverse Project (Research Institute for Humanity and Nature) across several international case studies from a database of pluriversal land use projects inspired by Elinor Ostrom’s common pool resource and the IPBES transformative change case databases. Finally, we take inspiration from the CREATURES framework to propose an outline of the next itineration of the framework designed as a co-designed, reflexive tool empowering practitioners to explore their worldview-value-practice connections to better articulate their vision and foster collaboration across projects. 

How to cite: Rupprecht, C., Ingaruca Moreno, M., Yamashita, M., Honda, Y., Wang, Y., Nakayama, M., Droz, L., Battani, A., McGreevy, S., Ota, K., and Tamura, N.: Linking pluriversal worldviews with land use practice: early insights from the Pluriverse Project, World Biodiversity Forum 2026, Davos, Switzerland, 14–19 Jun 2026, WBF2026-578, https://doi.org/10.5194/wbf2026-578, 2026.