WBF2026-581, updated on 10 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/wbf2026-581
World Biodiversity Forum 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 18 Jun, 15:00–15:15 (CEST)| Room Schwarzhorn
Business impact on biodiversity
Rajat Panwar1, Lisa Mandle2, Ryo Kohsaka3, Mark Johnston4, Claudia Romero5, Joe Bull6, Nicholas Oguge7, Beatrice Crona8, Kishaylin Chetty9, Sharon Chelangat10, Daniel Itzamna Avila-Ortega11, Sasha Gennet12, and Habiba Atta13
Rajat Panwar et al.
  • 1Oregon State University USA (rajat.panwar@oregonstate.edu)
  • 2Stanford University USA (lmandle@stanford.edu)
  • 3The University of Tokyo (kohsaka@hotmail.com)
  • 4DEFRA UK (MAJ1004@hotmail.co.uk)
  • 5Univ of Florida USA romero@ufl.edu
  • 6Univ of Oxford UK (joseph.bull@biology.ox.ac.uk)
  • 7Univ of Nairobi Kenya (otienoh.oguge@gmail.com)
  • 8Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Sweden (beatrice.crona@su.se)
  • 9Endangered Wildlife Trust South Africa (chettykishaylin@gmail.com)
  • 10Ministry of Environment and Forestry Kenya (sharone.chelangat@gmail.com)
  • 11Stockholm University Sweden (daniel.avila@su.se)
  • 12The Nature Conservancy USA sgennet@tnc.org
  • 13Ahmadu Bello University Nigeria hatta44@gmail.com

Understanding how businesses generate, amplify, or mitigate pressures and impacts on biodiversity is essential for enabling transformative change toward the 2050 Vision of “Living in Harmony with Nature.” Drawing on insights from Chapter 3 of the upcoming IPBES Business & Biodiversity Assessment, this contribution synthesises the main aspects, impact types, and pathways through which business activities affect biodiversity directly or indirectly across sectors and value chains. It outlines how different forms of economic activity shape ecological outcomes and why a clear grasp of these relationships is central to designing effective interventions. The session highlights the distinctions between direct and indirect drivers of biodiversity loss and shows how businesses—depending on their sector, operational model, and geographic footprint—can exert pressures on biodiversity at multiple scales.

A key takeaway is the recognition that business impacts are rarely isolated. Instead, they are embedded in complex, interdependent networks of supply-chain relationships and cross-sectoral linkages. These impacts vary widely, ranging from highly visible direct pressures to diffuse indirect effects that accumulate over time. They also interact with differing production profiles—from small and informal economic activities to large-scale formal operations—shaping biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people in both positive and negative ways.

Insights from the assessment also make clear that major challenges persist. Significant data and methodological gaps continue to limit the field, resulting in inconsistent and fragmented impact metrics that hinder a full understanding of who, what, and where biodiversity is affected. Nonetheless, there is strong consistency in identifying that primary sectors, particularly extractive industries, remain those that most substantially affect biodiversity, with their impacts reverberating across upstream and downstream supply chains globally.

Overall, this chapter underscores the need for cross-sectoral, science-based approaches that can identify leverage points capable of meaningfully reducing biodiversity pressures. Such approaches provide a critical foundation for coordinated, whole-of-society efforts to bend the curve of biodiversity loss.

How to cite: Panwar, R., Mandle, L., Kohsaka, R., Johnston, M., Romero, C., Bull, J., Oguge, N., Crona, B., Chetty, K., Chelangat, S., Avila-Ortega, D. I., Gennet, S., and Atta, H.: Business impact on biodiversity, World Biodiversity Forum 2026, Davos, Switzerland, 14–19 Jun 2026, WBF2026-581, https://doi.org/10.5194/wbf2026-581, 2026.