- 1University of Zurich, Geography, Remote Sensing Laboratories, Zurich, Switzerland (maria.j.santos@geo.uzh.ch)
- 2Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Lausanne, Géopolis 3793, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
- 3National Scientific and Technical Research Council, Argentina
- 4Finnish Environmental Institute, Finland
- 5Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Norway
- 6School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
- 7Department of Geography, Cambridge University
- 8U.S. Geological SUrvey, United States of America
- 9Department of Global Development , Cornell University, United States of America
- 10The Nature Conservancy, United States of America
- 11IPBES, United Nations, Bonn, Germany
- 12Wetlands International South Asia
- 13College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri, United States of America
The recently approved and published IPBES Nexus Assessment, focuses on the interactions and interlinkages between biodiversity, water, food, health and climate. This assessment, requested by member states signatory to IPBES, defines nexus approaches, scenarios for nexus interactions and response options to each of the nexus elements with particular focus on cascading effects beyond a single nexus element. Within this context, we reviewed the literature, developed, analyzed and examined the response options for water and their percolation to the other nexus elements. In this presentation, we will show (i) our process to identify the water response options which included multiple knowledge systems, (ii) their evaluation through assessing enablers and barriers, feasibility, context and scale and governance, and (iii) the robustness of our knowledge on the effectiveness of these response options to deliver on water quantity and quality. Currently, ~80% of humanity’s freshwater demand is used to meet food production, 75% of the global population in 2005 is dependent on forest for accessible freshwater, and at least 50 diseases are attributable to poor water supply, quality and sanitation. A total of 111 response options were identified through the screening of literature, governmental and other actor's reports, expert knowledge and consultation with Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC) representatives. These then went through a triangulation and clustering process to a final set of 15 response options, which were examined in depth by conducting a systematic literature review and consulation with experts and IPLC representatives, and underwetnt extensive review during the assessment process. We find that the 15 response options that we examined cut across more than two nexus elements, yet we found no response option that would deliver benefits to all nexus elements concurrently. Particularly, stronger or more robust trade-offs emerge when water, biodiversity and food systems are considered. Future scenarios show that a nature positive nexus will concurrently deliver on all nexus elements, and for water specifically, the strongest impacts emerge if food systems are prioritized as well as nature overexploitation.
How to cite: Santos, M. J., Kouame, A. A., Minaverry, C. M., Kulmala, S., Sandin, L., Simatele, M., Rafa, N., Embke, H., Gupta, A., Mason D'Croz, D., Chian Phang, S., van Huysen, T., Kumar, R., and Paukert, C.: IPBES Nexus assessment Options for delivering sustainable approaches to water, World Biodiversity Forum 2026, Davos, Switzerland, 14–19 Jun 2026, WBF2026-844, https://doi.org/10.5194/wbf2026-844, 2026.