Orals

NH3.16

Large slope instabilities have been frequently recognised in areas with different lithological (sedimentary, igneous, metamorphic rocks) and geological domains (cordillera, volcanic, etc.). Slow to very fast moving, complex mass movements have been recognized and sometimes described as strongly interrelated. Many types of slope instabilities can be grouped within this broad class, each presenting different types of hazard and risk. Some major aspects of these slope instabilities are still understudied and debated, namely:
- their regional distribution and relevance;
- triggering and controlling factors, including possible climatic changes;
- hydrological boundary conditions and evolution or control of internal hydrogeological conditions;
- mechanical controls in terms of physical mechanical properties of failure surfaces and shear zones
- dating of initial movements and reactivation episodes;
- style and state of past and present activity;
- passive and/or active control by structural-tectonic elements of the bedrock geology;
- possible styles of evolution and consequent modeling approaches;
- assessment of related hazard;
- influence of external anthropogenic factors and effects on structures and infrastructures (e.g. tunnels, dams, bridges);
- role on the general erosional and sediment yield regime at the local or mountain belt scale;
- best technologies and approaches for implementing a correct monitoring and warning system and for the interpretation of monitoring data in terms of landslide activity and behavior.

Study of these instabilities requires a multidisciplinary approach involving geology, geomorphology, geomechanics, hydro-geochemistry, and geophysics. These phenomena have been recognized on Earth as well as on other planetary bodies (e.g. Mars, Moon).
Trenching and drilling can be used for material characterization, recognition of episodes of activity, and sampling in slow slope movements. At the same time many different approaches can be used for monitoring and establishing of warning thresholds and systems for such phenomena.
Geophysical survey methods can be used to assess both the geometrical and geomechanical characteristics of the unstable mass. Different dating techniques can be applied to determine the age and stages of movement. Many modeling approaches can be applied to evaluate instability and failure (e.g. displacement and velocity thresholds), triggering mechanisms (e.g. rainfall, seismicity, volcanic eruption, deglaciation), failure propagation, rapid mass movements (rock avalanches, debris avalanches and flows), and related secondary failures (rock fall and debris flows).
Studies of hydraulic and hydrologic boundary conditions and hydrochemistry are involved, both at the moment of initial failure and, later, during reactivation. The impacts of such instabilities on structures and human activities can be substantial and of a variety of forms (e.g. deformation or failure of structures and infrastructure, burial of developed areas, etc.).
Furthermore, the local and regional sediment yield could be influenced by the landsliding activity and different landslides (e.g. type, size) can play different roles.

Share:
Co-organized as GM7.7/HS11.42, co-sponsored by JpGU
Convener: Giovanni Crosta | Co-conveners: Federico Agliardi, Masahiro Chigira, Irene Manzella
Orals
| Tue, 09 Apr, 14:00–18:00
 
Room L1
Posters
| Attendance Tue, 09 Apr, 10:45–12:30
 
Hall X3

Tuesday, 9 April 2019 | Room L1

Chairperson: G. Crosta, M. Chigira
14:30–14:45 |
EGU2019-17323
William Meservy, Roger Urgeles, and Eulàlia Gràcia
14:45–15:00 |
EGU2019-6079
Sergio A. Sepulveda, Diego Chacon, Stella M. Moreiras, and Fernando Poblete
15:00–15:15 |
EGU2019-3702
Corinne Singeisen, Susan Ivy-Ochs, Andrea Wolter, Olivia Kronig, Serdar Yesilyurt, Christof Vockenhuber, and Naki Akçar
15:15–15:30 |
EGU2019-12183
Osamu Yokoyama and Masahiro Chigira
15:30–15:45 |
EGU2019-9650
Þorsteinn Sæmundsson, Jón Kristinn Helgason, Daniel Ben-Yehoshua, Bergur H. Bergsson, Benedikt Ófeigsson, Eyjólfur Magnússon, Ásta Rut Hjartardóttir, Vincent Drouin, Joaquin Munoz Cobo Belart, Harpa Grímsdóttir, Gro Birkefeldt Møller Pedersen, Finnur Pálsson, Snævarr Guðmundsson, and Halldór Geirsson
Coffee break
Chairperson: F. Agliardi, I. Manzella
16:15–16:30 |
EGU2019-12891
Virginie Durand, Anne Mangeney, Fabian Bonilla, Pascal Bernard, Clément Hibert, Aline Peltier, Xiaoping Jia, Philippe Kowalski, Frédéric Lauret, Christophe Brunet, Claudio Satriano, Madani Aissaoui, Jean-Marie Saurel, Valérie Ferrazzini, and Antoine Protin
16:30–16:45 |
EGU2019-17278
Gudrun Dreiås Majala, Lars Harald Blikra, and Lene Kristensen
17:00–17:15 |
EGU2019-19028
Gustav Pless, Marie Etchebes, Lars Harald Blikra, and Lene Kristensen
17:15–17:30 |
EGU2019-19046
Lars Harald Blikra, Mario Lovisolo, Gustav Pless, and Lene Kristensen
17:30–17:45 |
EGU2019-4479
Michele Delchiaro, Javad Rouhi, Marta Della Seta, Salvatore Martino, Reza Nozaem, and Maryam Dehbozorgi
17:45–18:00 |
EGU2019-17175
Hadar Elyashiv, Revital Bookman, Uri S. ten Brink, and Katrin Huhn