EGU2020-13452
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-13452
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

How do microorganisms from permafrost soils respond to short-term warming?

Victoria Martin1, Julia Wagner2, Niek Speetjens3, Rachele Lodi4, Julia Horak1, Carolina Urbina-Malo1, Moritz Mohrlok1, Cornelia Rottensteiner1, Willeke a' Campo2, Luca Durstewitz2, George Tanski3, Michael Fritz5, Hugues Lantuit5, Gustaf Hugelius2, and Andreas Richter1
Victoria Martin et al.
  • 1University of Vienna, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Wien, Austria
  • 2Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, Sweden
  • 3Department of Earth and Climate, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 4National Research Council, Institute of Polar Science, Venecia Mestre, Italy
  • 5Geosciences and Permafrost Research, Alfred Wegener Institute Potsdam, Germany

Arctic ecosystems outpace the global rate of temperature increases and are exceptionally susceptible to global warming. Concerns are raising that CO2 and CH4 released from thawing permafrost upon warming may induce a positive feedback to climate change. This is based on the assumption, that microbial activity increases with warming and does not acclimate over time. However, we lack a mechanistic understanding of carbon and nutrient fluxes including their spatial control in the very heterogeneous Arctic landscape. The objective of this study therefore was to elucidate the microbial controls over soil organic matter decomposition in different horizons of the active layer and upper permafrost. We investigated different landscape units (high-centre polygons, low-centre polygons and flat polygon tundra) in two small catchments that differ in glacial history, at the Yukon coast, Northwestern Canada.

In total, 81 soil samples were subjected to short-term (eight weeks) incubation experiments at controlled temperature (4 °C and 14 °C) and moisture conditions. Heterotrophic respiration was assessed weekly, whereas physiological parameters of soil microbes and their temperature response (Q10) were determined at the end of the incubation period. Microbial growth was estimated by measuring the incorporation of 18O from labelled water into DNA and used to calculate microbial carbon use efficiencies (CUE). Microbial biomass was determined via chloroform fumigation extraction. Potential activities of extracellular enzymes involved in C, N, P and S cycling were measured using microplate fluorimetric assays.

Cumulative heterotrophic respiration of investigated soil layers followed the pattern organic layers > upper frozen permafrost > cryoturbated material > mineral layers in both catchments. Microbial respiration responded strongly in all soils to warming in all soils, but the observed response was highest for organic layers and cryoturbated material at the beginning and end of the experiment. Average Q10 values at the beginning of the experiment varied between 1.7 to 4.3 with differences between horizons but converged towards Q10 values between 2.0min to 2.9max after eight weeks of incubation. Even though microbial biomass C did not change with warming, microbial mass specific growth was enhanced in organic, cryoturbated and permafrost soils. Overall, warming resulted in a 65% reduced CUE in organic horizons.

Our results show no indication for physiological acclimatization of permafrost soil microbes when subjected to 8-weeks of experimental warming. Given that the duration of the season in which most horizons are unfrozen is rarely longer than 2 months, our results do not support an acclimation of microbial activity under natural conditions. Instead, our data supports the current view of a high potential for prolonged carbon losses from tundra soils with warming by enhanced microbial activity.

This work is part of the EU H2020 project “Nunataryuk”.

How to cite: Martin, V., Wagner, J., Speetjens, N., Lodi, R., Horak, J., Urbina-Malo, C., Mohrlok, M., Rottensteiner, C., a' Campo, W., Durstewitz, L., Tanski, G., Fritz, M., Lantuit, H., Hugelius, G., and Richter, A.: How do microorganisms from permafrost soils respond to short-term warming?, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-13452, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-13452, 2020.