EGU2020-1998
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-1998
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Validating future gravity missions via optical clock networks

Stefan Schröder1, Anne Springer1, Jürgen Kusche1, and Simon Stellmer2
Stefan Schröder et al.
  • 1Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany (schroeder@geod.uni-bonn.de)
  • 2Physics Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Stationary optical clocks show fractional instabilities below 10-18 when averaged over an hour, and continue to be improved in terms of precision and accuracy, uptime and transportability. The frequency of a clock is affected by the gravitational redshift, and thus depends on the local geopotential; a relative frequency change of 10-18 corresponds to a geoid height change of about 1 cm. This effect could be exploited for sensing large-scale temporal geopotential changes via a network of clocks distributed at the Earth's surface. The CLOck NETwork Services (CLONETS) project aims to create an ensemble of optical clocks connected across Europe via optical fibre links.
A station network spread over Europe, which is already installed in parts, would enable us to determine temporal variations of the Earth's gravity field at time scales of days  and thus provide a new means for validating satellite missions such as GRACE-FO or potential Next Generation Gravity Missions. However, mass changes at the surface of an elastic Earth are accompanied by load-induced height changes, and clocks are sensitive to non-loading e.g. tectonic height changes as well. As a result, local and global mass redistribution as well as local height change will be entangled in clock readings, and very precise  GNSS measurements will be required to separate them.
Here, we show through simulations how ice (glacier mass imbalance), hydrology (water storage) and atmosphere (dry and wet air mass) signals over Europe could be observed with the currently proposed/established clock network geometry and how potential extensions can benefit this observability. The importance of collocated GNSS receivers is demonstrated for the sake of signal separation.

How to cite: Schröder, S., Springer, A., Kusche, J., and Stellmer, S.: Validating future gravity missions via optical clock networks, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-1998, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-1998, 2020

Display materials

Display file

Comments on the display material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

Display material version 1 – uploaded on 28 Apr 2020
  • CC1: Comment on EGU2020-1998, Jakob Flury, 07 May 2020

    Very interesting work, thank you for sharing! When we think about the development of frequency transfer networks, that gives an important perspective. Potential variations might indeed be more promising than superconducting gravimetry results in this context.

    Lars Lessmann in Hannover computed similar time series, e.g., for Heligoland, probably with a slightly different focus. Not sure how much of that is published.

    Jakob Flury

    • AC1: Reply to CC1, Stefan Schröder, 17 May 2020

      Thank you Jakob (and sorry for the late answer), I didn't know Lars Leßmann's work. Just had a look into https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2018.05.008

      He used Green's functions there, which we are probably going to do as well for some experiments.