Methane uptake by various forest soils with and without litter
- 1Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland
- 2University College Dublin, Ireland
- 3Wageningen University, Netherlands
- 4Helmholtz Center Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Germany
- 5Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), France
- 6Wageningen Environmental Research, Netherlands
- 7Teagasc, Ireland
Forest soils are often a sink for atmospheric methane (CH4) and are thus worth special attention in the context of mitigation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and offset of agricultural GHG emissions at farm to national levels. The litter layer influences the exchange of GHGs between soil and atmosphere; however, most studies focus on the contribution of only soil to the CH4 cycle. In order to improve the inventory of this gas, it is worth investigating how litter influences the exchange of GHGs. Its effect on CH4 uptake may vary in deciduous and coniferous sites due to the different properties of litter. Field experiments were carried out to assess the CH4 uptake capability in 5 different soil types (with and without litter) under different forest types (deciduous, coniferous, and mixed) in Poland. During summer 2019, the highest CH4 uptake (about 2 mg C m-2 day-1) in a variant without litter on the ground was detected in Dystric Cambisol (with the highest C/N ratio) under a 100-year-old coniferous forest and in Albic Luvisol under a 58-year-old mixed forest. The presence of the litter level reduced the CH4 flux in the range of 6-27% in these locations. Methane consumption was the lowest in silty soils (~ 0.4 – 1 mg C m-2 day-1) in the mixed forest and decreased by 13-29% when covered with the litter layer. The negative effect of the litter layer on CH4 absorption was the lowest (~ 3-4%) in sandy Eutric Gleysol under a 75-year-old deciduous forest with 90% of oak and 10% of European hornbeam. The dry conditions in the summer 2019 (with total rainfall 163 mm during the tested months in the studied region) resulted in low moisture in both the litter and soil. However, even low-humidity litter (below 10%) reduced CH4 consumption rates in the measured sites.
Research was partially conducted under the project financed by Polish National Centre for Research and Development within of ERA-NET CO-FUND ERA-GAS Programme (ERA-GAS/I/GHG-MANAGE/01/2018).
How to cite: Walkiewicz, A., Bulak, P., Osborne, B., Khalil, M. I., Islam, S. F., Kruijt, B., Hutjes, R., Spengler, D., Gottschalk, P., Sachs, T., Klumpp, K., Vigan, A., Hassouna, M., Henessy, D., and Shalloo, L.: Methane uptake by various forest soils with and without litter, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-4900, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-4900, 2020.