EGU2020-9025
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9025
EGU General Assembly 2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

On the use of the ground water fluxes for hydraulic tomography: Theoretical and field-based assessments

Behzad Pouladiborj1, Olivier Bour1, Niklas Linde2, Daniel Paradis3, Jean-Marc Ballard4, Jérôme de La Bernardie1, Nataline Simon1, Cynthia Lee4, laurent longuevergne1, and René Lefebvre4
Behzad Pouladiborj et al.
  • 1Univ Rennes, CNRS, Géosciences Rennes, UMR 6118, 35000 Rennes, France (behzad.pouladi@univ-rennes1.fr)
  • 2University of Lausanne, Applied and Environmental Geophysics Group, Institute of Earth Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 3Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, 490 rue de la Couronne, Québec, QC, Canada G1K
  • 4Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Centre Eau Terre Environnement, Québec, QC, Canada

Hydraulic tomography is known for imaging hydraulic conductivity of aquifers. In hydraulic tomography, the aquifer is stressed sequentially at several locations with pumping or slug tests while hydraulic heads are observed in different points. These hydraulic head data along with a numerical model are then used to reconstruct the hydraulic conductivity distribution of the aquifer through inversion process. The reconstructed distribution usually represents smooth-low resolution model of hydraulic conductivity which may be suitable for representation of groundwater flow with limited applicability to transport problems. Here, we investigate the added value of using groundwater fluxes measurement for the reconstruction of hydraulic conductivity in tomographic experiment. Vertical profile of groundwater flux may be estimated using active fiber optic distributed temperature sensor (FO-DTS) methods with FO cables installed by direct push so as it is in direct contact with formation. In active FO-DTS, FO cable is heated and heat is transported by conduction and convection. So different water fluxes result in different temperature behavior. This study is carried out in two parts. First, we conducted a synthetic analyze where we used a sequence of synthetic multivariate Gaussian aquifers with different tomographic configurations and datasets. This analysis showed that joint inversion of groundwater fluxes and hydraulic heads leads to better hydraulic conductivity resolution than using hydraulic heads solely. Inversion of groundwater fluxes alone is also superior than using only hydraulic heads. Then, insights gained from the synthetic study were used to guide the implementation of a field study at the Saint-Lambert experimental site located 40 km south of Quebec City, Canada. The tomography experiment was performed between 3 wells closely spaced (between 5 and 9 m) and two active FO-DTS cables. FO cables were installed vertically by a direct push drilling technique at mid-point between the central pumping well and two observation wells. Discrete intervals along the observation wells were also isolated with packers to monitor temperature and hydraulic heads at different depths in these two screened observational wells. First, the aquifer was constrained to pumping continuously for 24 hours at a constant rate of 10 LPM with simultaneously recording temperature (passive mode) and hydraulic heads in 8 discrete well intervals and in the pumping well itself as well as along the 2 FO-DTS with approximate resolution of 25 cm. Then, by analyzing the piezo-metric heads and making sure that steady-state conditions were achieved, the pumping was held at the same rate but heat was injected to fiber optic cables (active mode) for another 64-hour period. After this period, heating and pumping were stopped. Preliminary results show the feasibility of the active FO-DTS in capturing varying groundwater fluxes with depth, as reflected in the different temporal temperature trend. These temperature trends will be used to estimate the vertical groundwater flux profile from these temperature temporal trends at a vertical resolution of approximately 25 cm. Then estimated fluxes will be used for hydraulic tomography. Those experimental results along with the synthetic analyze are shown to be promising in improving characterization of hydraulic conductivity of aquifers.

How to cite: Pouladiborj, B., Bour, O., Linde, N., Paradis, D., Ballard, J.-M., de La Bernardie, J., Simon, N., Lee, C., longuevergne, L., and Lefebvre, R.: On the use of the ground water fluxes for hydraulic tomography: Theoretical and field-based assessments , EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-9025, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9025, 2020

This abstract will not be presented.