EGU21-5360, updated on 04 Mar 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-5360
EGU General Assembly 2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Assessing the response of coccolithophores and foraminifera to enhanced ocean alkalinity as a CO2 sequestration technique

Sophie Gill1, Rosalind Rickaby1, Jonathan Erez2, and Gideon Henderson1
Sophie Gill et al.
  • 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 2The Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

The alkalinity of seawater sets the overall capacity of the ocean to hold carbon dioxide in dissolved forms. Variations in past alkalinity, related to changing weathering or carbonate compensation, may have played an important role in moderating or controlling past variations of atmospheric pCO2.  Future manipulation of ocean alkalinity by direct addition of suitable chemicals to seawater, or through enhanced weathering on land, has also been suggested as one possible route to intentionally draw CO2 from the modern atmosphere and mitigate the impacts of future climate change [1]. Although we know an increasing amount about how biological species and ecosystems respond to changes in pH, we know much less about their response to changes in alkalinity. Calcifying plankton play a crucial role in modulating the surface ocean carbonate system and its buffering of alkalinity perturbations [2]. Here we investigate the growth and calcification response of both coccolithophores and foraminifera to elevated ocean alkalinity and potential CO2 limitation [3] through a series of carefully designed batch culture laboratory experiments. Alkalinity is raised by two different methods during the experiments: by (i) addition of NaHCO3 and (ii) addition of Na2CO3 and CaCl2. The reason for two differing elevated alkalinity treatments is that they allow us to constrain how physiology and calcification respond to two different modes of alkalinity manipulation; both of which provide simple laboratory analogues for probable real-world scenarios.

I will present results from experiments with two species of coccolithophores: Emiliania huxleyi and Coccolithus braarudii, as well as two species of planktonic foraminifera: Gloigerinoides ruber and Globigerinella siphonifera. We have found that the main bloom-forming coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, may increase its calcification and growth rate in response to enhanced alkalinity up to Total Alkalinity (TA) = 4000µmol/kg. Whereas Coccolithus braarudii, a much larger and relatively less abundant coccolithophore, shows only a hint of increased calcification in enhanced alkalinity, with negligible changes in growth rate in enhanced alkalinity up to a threshold of Total Alkalinity (TA) = 3500µmol/kg. However, at TA = 4000µmol/kg, C. braarudii’s growth is significantly suppressed/delayed compared to control conditions. In contrast, planktonic foraminifera’s gametogenic success rate alters with enhanced alkalinity, and they may live longer in enhanced alkalinity before undergoing gametogenesis, but with no concurrent measurable increase in calcification. These results from two major groups of calcifiers have implications for future experiments on biotic response to ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) schemes, as well as implications for the design implementation of OAE schemes. 

[1] Renforth, P., Henderson, G., 2017. Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration. Rev. Geophys. [2] Boudreau, B.P., Middelburg, J.J., Luo, Y., 2018. The role of calcification in carbonate compensation. Nat. Geosci. 11, 894. [3] Bach, L. T., Gill, S. J., Rickaby, R. E. M., Gore, S., Renforth, P., 2019. CO2 Removal With Enhanced Weathering and Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement: Potential Risks and Co-Benefits for Marine Pelagic Ecosystems. Frontiers in Climate 1.

How to cite: Gill, S., Rickaby, R., Erez, J., and Henderson, G.: Assessing the response of coccolithophores and foraminifera to enhanced ocean alkalinity as a CO2 sequestration technique, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-5360, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-5360, 2021.

Display materials

Display file

vOSPP judging on display materials

This contribution takes part in the vOSPP contest. Please log in to see the relevant judging section.

Comments on the display material

to access the discussion