EGU22-10201
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-10201
EGU General Assembly 2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Flux Partitioning Methods for Water Vapor and Carbon Dioxide

Elie Bou-Zeid1, Einara Zahn1, Khaled Ghannam1, Marcelo Chamecki2, Gabriel Katul3, Christoph Thomas4, and William Kustas5
Elie Bou-Zeid et al.
  • 1Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton NJ, United States of America (ebouzeid@princeton.edu)
  • 2Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles CA, United States of America
  • 3Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham NC, United States of America
  • 4Micrometeorology Group and Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
  • 5National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, USDA ARS, Ames IA, United States of America

The partitioning of ecosystem evapotranspiration and carbon dioxide fluxes into their plant and ground components is a critical research priority to better understand the water cycle and ecosystem function. Despite advances in different measurement techniques and partitioning models in the last decades, much is still unknown regarding the importance of different components of H2O and CO2 fluxes in ecosystems. In this work, we compare three partitioning methods that are based on analysis of conventional high frequency eddy-covariance (EC) data: the flux variance similarity method, the modified relaxed eddy accumulation methods, and the conditional eddy covariance method. First, we test these methods using fields experimental data, comparing them to other reference measurements for the components fluxes (gas chambers and leaf levels measurements). Subsequently, we develop a novel approach for simulating these fluxes in large eddy simulations and apply it to further probe the performance, assumptions, and relative skill of the three methods. The findings allow us to recommend partitioning best practices for their implementation, and to develop methods for the joint analyses of the various approaches.

How to cite: Bou-Zeid, E., Zahn, E., Ghannam, K., Chamecki, M., Katul, G., Thomas, C., and Kustas, W.: Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Flux Partitioning Methods for Water Vapor and Carbon Dioxide, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-10201, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-10201, 2022.