EGU22-6653
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-6653
EGU General Assembly 2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Frontiers in quantitative paleogeography and paleomagnetism

Mat Domeier1, Maëlis Arnould2, Athena Eyster3, Leandro C. Gallo1, Derya Gürer4, Ágnes Király1, Boris Robert5, Tobias Rolf1, Facundo Sapienza6, Grace E. Shephard1, Nick Swanson-Hysell7, Bram Vaes8, Annique van der Boon1, Lei Wu9, and Yiming Zhang7
Mat Domeier et al.
  • 1CEED, University of Oslo, Norway
  • 2Laboratoire de Géologie de Lyon (LGL-TPE), University of Lyon 1, France
  • 3Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, Johns Hopkins University, United States
  • 4School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia
  • 5German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), Potsdam, Germany
  • 6Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, United States
  • 7Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, United States
  • 8Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
  • 9Department of Earth and Planetary Science, McGill University, Canada

The last few years have been marked by a number of motivating novel ideas and methodological advancements in paleomagnetic analysis (e.g. trans-hierarchical uncertainty propagation), observational and theoretical geodynamics, and paleogeographical modeling (e.g. optimisation and Bayesian approaches). Many of these developments offer new insights on, and/or approaches to estimating, the past motions of tectonic plates—but so far these developments have largely unfolded in isolation of one another. In November 2021 an international group of 15 young scientists with highly complementary backgrounds (spanning the aforementioned fields) gathered to explore and discuss these exciting new developments and to brainstorm strategies that may enable their integration. We anticipate that the integration of these diverse new ideas and methods will open new frontiers in plate tectonic research, and notably lead to much better-constrained paleogeographic models. In this presentation, we will share some of the insights and strategies that emerged from the workshop, including the advantages of conducting paleomagnetic analysis at the site-level, the application of emerging paleomagnetic Euler pole analysis frameworks, and the use of insights extracted from Earth-like geodynamic models (which self-generate plate tectonic behavior) to further constrain the results of these paleomagnetic methods. We also present some preliminary results of early experiments putting these strategies into practice on a paleomagnetic dataset from North America.  

How to cite: Domeier, M., Arnould, M., Eyster, A., Gallo, L. C., Gürer, D., Király, Á., Robert, B., Rolf, T., Sapienza, F., Shephard, G. E., Swanson-Hysell, N., Vaes, B., van der Boon, A., Wu, L., and Zhang, Y.: Frontiers in quantitative paleogeography and paleomagnetism, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-6653, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-6653, 2022.