EGU23-10624, updated on 26 Feb 2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10624
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Seamless subseasonal probabilistic streamflow forecasting: MuTHRE lets you have your cake and eat it too 

Mark Thyer1, David McInerney1, Dmitri Kavetski1, Richard Laugesen2, Fitsum Woldemeskel2, Narendra Tuteja3, and George Kuczera4
Mark Thyer et al.
  • 1University of Adelaide, School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Adelaide, Australia (mark.thyer@adelaide.edu.au)
  • 2Bureau of Meteorology, Canberra, Australia
  • 3WaterNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • 4School of Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia

Subseasonal streamflow forecasts inform a multitude of water management decisions, from early flood warning to reservoir operation. ‘Seamless’ probabilistic forecasts, i.e., forecasts that are reliable and sharp over a range of lead times (1-30 days) and aggregation time scales (e.g. daily to monthly) are of clear practical interest. However, existing forecast products are often ‘non-seamless’, i.e., developed and applied for a single time scale and lead time (e.g. 1 month ahead). If seamless forecasts are to be a viable replacement for existing ‘non-seamless’ forecasts, it is important that they offer (at least) similar predictive performance at the time scale of the non-seamless forecast.

This study compares forecasts from two probabilistic streamflow post-processing (QPP) models: the recently developed seamless daily Multi-Temporal Hydrological Residual Error (MuTHRE) model and the more traditional (non-seamless) monthly QPP model used in the Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s Dynamic Forecasting System. Streamflow forecasts from both post-processing models are generated for 11 Australian catchments, using the GR4J hydrological model and pre-processed rainfall forecasts from the ACCESS-S numerical weather prediction model. Evaluating monthly forecasts with key performance metrics (reliability, sharpness, bias and CRPS skill score), we find that the seamless MuTHRE model achieves essentially the same performance as the non-seamless monthly QPP model for the vast majority of metrics and temporal stratifications (months and years). As such, MuTHRE provides the capability of ‘seamless’ daily streamflow forecasts with no loss of performance at the monthly scale – the modeller can proverbially ‘have their cake and eat it too’. This finding demonstrates that seamless forecasting technologies, such as the MuTHRE post-processing model, are not only viable, but a preferred choice for future research development and practical adoption in streamflow forecasting.

How to cite: Thyer, M., McInerney, D., Kavetski, D., Laugesen, R., Woldemeskel, F., Tuteja, N., and Kuczera, G.: Seamless subseasonal probabilistic streamflow forecasting: MuTHRE lets you have your cake and eat it too , EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-10624, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10624, 2023.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material file