EGU23-13637
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13637
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Comparison of fluvial and aeolian sedimentary environments based on morphological analysis of their mineral components

Fruzsina Gresina1,2, Beáta Farkas4, Szabolcs Ákos Fábián4, Zoltán Szalai1,2, and György Varga1,3
Fruzsina Gresina et al.
  • 1Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Geographical Institute, Budapest, Hungary (gresina.fruzsina@csfk.org)
  • 2ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, Department of Environmental and Landscape Geography, Budapest, Hungary
  • 3ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, Department of Meteorology, Budapest, Hungary
  • 4University of Pécs, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, Department of Physical and Environmental Geography, Pécs, Hungary

The relationship between depositional environments and transportation processes associated with the general properties of formed siliciclastic sediments has been of great interest to researchers. The recent spread of high-resolution analytical methods has allowed researchers to quickly examine grain shape properties of a large number of individual mineral grains. We investigated mineral particles of two sediment types from different depositional environments (wind-blown sand, floodplain and channel deposits [n=11]) from the Carpathian Basin (Central Europe) by using automated static image analysis (Malvern Morphologi G3SE-ID). Our aim was to determine the key variables that can help us distinguish fluvial and aeolian environments. During the analysis and data processing (e.g. hierarchical cluster analysis, Wilks’ λ, Kruskal-Wallis, MANOVA, PCA) we examined four variables related to grain shape which were the following circularity (form), convexity (surface texture), solidity (roundness) and elongation (form).

The objective and the quantitative study revealed that the solidity parameter proved to be an effective variable for separating sediments with similar convexity values (mean: 0.95-0.99) like in our case, the aeolian and fluvial sediments. Fluvial sediments had lower solidity (mean: 0.95-0.97) values compared to the aeolian sands (mean: 0.97-0.98). This major difference (p<0.001; α=0.05) resembles that the investigated fluvial sediments are not as much rounded as aeolian sands. Associated with circularity (form) result, it can be deduced that grains from fluvial sediments (low circularity; mean: 0.76-0.84) spent less time in the transport media or transported at lower energy level than aeolian grains (high circularity; mean: 0.82-0.87). Our research supports the previously established theory that aeolian transport is more effective in rounding the grains than an aqueous environment.

Support of the National Research, Development and Innovation Office (Hungary) under contract FK138692, ÚNKP-22-3 and RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00014 are gratefully acknowledged.

How to cite: Gresina, F., Farkas, B., Fábián, S. Á., Szalai, Z., and Varga, G.: Comparison of fluvial and aeolian sedimentary environments based on morphological analysis of their mineral components, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-13637, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13637, 2023.