EGU23-1537, updated on 20 Dec 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-1537
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

The tale of two tracers: No evidence for systematic underestimation of transit times inferred by stable isotopes in SAS function models.

Markus Hrachowitz1, Siyuan Wang1, Gerrit Schoups1, and Christine Stumpp2
Markus Hrachowitz et al.
  • 1Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Department of Watermanagement, Delft, Netherlands (m.hrachowitz@tudelft.nl)
  • 2University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Institute of Soil Physics and Rural Water Management, Vienna, Austria

Stable isotopes (δ18O) and tritium (3H) are frequently used as tracers in environmental sciences to estimate age distributions of water. However, it has previously been argued that seasonally variable tracers, such as δ18O, generally and systematically fail to detect the tails of water age distributions and therefore substantially underestimate water ages as compared to radioactive tracers, such as 3H. In this study for the Neckar river basin in central Europe and based on a >20-year record of hydrological, δ18O and 3H data, we systematically scrutinized the above postulate. This was done by comparing water age distributions inferred from δ18O and 3H with a total of 12 different model implementations, including lumped parameter sine-wave (SW) and convolution integral models (CO) as well as integrated hydrological models in combination with SAS-functions (IM-SAS).

We found that, indeed, water ages inferred from δ18O with commonly used SW and CO models are with mean transit times (MTT) ~ 1 – 2 years substantially lower than those obtained from 3H with the same models, reaching MTTs ~ 10 years. In contrast, several implementations of IM-SAS models did not only allow simultaneous representations of stream flow as well as δ18O and 3H stream signals, but water ages inferred from δ18O with these models were with MTTs ~ 16 years much higher than those from SW and CO models and similar to those inferred from 3H, which suggested MTTs ~ 15 years. Characterized by similar parameter posterior distributions, in particular for parameters that control water age, IM-SAS model implementations individually constrained with δ18O or 3H observations, exhibited only limited differences in the magnitudes of water ages in different parts of the models as well as in the temporal variability of TTDs in response to changing wetness conditions. This suggests that both tracers lead to comparable descriptions of how water is routed through the system. These findings provide evidence that allowed us to reject the hypothesis that δ18O as a tracer generally and systematically “cannot see water older than about 4 years” and that it truncates the corresponding tails in water age distributions, leading to underestimations of water ages. Instead, our results provide evidence for a broad equivalence of δ18O and 3H as age tracers for systems characterized by MTTs of at least 15 – 20 years.

Overall, this study demonstrates that previously reported underestimations of water ages are most likely not a result of the use of δ18O or other seasonally variable tracers per se. Rather, these underestimations can be largely attributed to choices of model approaches and complexity not considering hydrological next to tracer aspects. We therefore advocate to avoid the use of this model type in combination with seasonally variable tracers if possible, and to instead adopt SAS-based or comparable model formulations.

How to cite: Hrachowitz, M., Wang, S., Schoups, G., and Stumpp, C.: The tale of two tracers: No evidence for systematic underestimation of transit times inferred by stable isotopes in SAS function models., EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-1537, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-1537, 2023.