EGU23-15559
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-15559
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Aseismic rupture on rate-weakening faults before slip instability

Sohom Ray1,2 and Dmitry I. Garagash3
Sohom Ray and Dmitry I. Garagash
  • 1Earthquake Engineeering Department, IIT Roorkee, India (sohom.ray@eq.iitr.ac.in)
  • 2Mehta Family School of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, IIT Roorkee, India, (sohom.ray@eq.iitr.ac.in)
  • 3Dalhousie University, Civil and Resource Engineering Department, Halifax, Canada, (garagash@dal.ca)

The nucleation of earthquakes relies on an interfacial instability that facilitates the transition of a slow fault slip to a faster dynamic rupture. Here, we highlight the scenarios when (rate-weakening) interfaces exhibit a phase of slow aseismic rupture—before slip instability—that propagate large distances compared to the usual nucleation sizes. This aseismic rupture propagation results from rate-weakening interfaces' response to reach a state of steady sliding when forced to slip below steady-state frictional conditions. We numerically simulate the slip cycle—aseismic rupture, instability, and dynamic rupture—driven by prototype loading configurations:

  • Slip dislocation accrues at a constant rate at one end of a finite fault with the other end (a) at the free surface of an elastic half-space and (b) completely locked (buried) in an elastic full-space.
  • Imposed slip dislocation accruing at a constant rate on both ends of a finite fault
  • A localized distribution of shear traction that increases at a constant rate.

All the above loading conditions can permit a slow aseismic rupture along the fault when the fault is initially locked: a state of interfacial slip for which the frictional strength, at the current slip rate, is significantly less than the steady-state frictional strength at the same slip rate. The slow rupture occurs in all the above loading configurations when the fault is initially locked; the subsequent transition to instability, or not, shows a fault-size dependence for configurations 1a and 1b, even when the fault exceeds the usual nucleation sizes. The cut-off fault size that permits instability after aseismic rupture also depends on the friction parameters, the extent of initial contrast from steady-state sliding, and slip conditions towards which aseismic rupture progresses. The remaining loading configurations exhibit instability whenever the fault size exceeds the usual nucleation sizes. Further, we find that slow rupture’s transition to early-stage instability happens through an intermediate breathing (spatiotemporal oscillation) type evolution of slip rate.

How to cite: Ray, S. and Garagash, D. I.: Aseismic rupture on rate-weakening faults before slip instability, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-15559, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-15559, 2023.