EGU23-2969
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2969
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Probing the 4D evolution of active magmatic systems through magnetotelluric monitoring

Graham Hill1, Max Moorkamp2, Yann Avram3, Colin Hogg4, Kati Mateschke2, Sofia Gahr2, Adam Schultz5, Esteban Bowles-Martinez5, Jared Peacock6, Gokhan Karcioglu1, Chaojian Chen2, Corrado Cimarelli2, Luca Carrichi7, and Yasuo Ogawa8
Graham Hill et al.
  • 1Institute of Geophysics, Prague 4, Czechia (gjhill@ig.cas.cz)
  • 2LMU University Munich
  • 3Phoenix Geophysics
  • 4Dublin Institute of Advanced Studies
  • 5Oregon State University
  • 6USGS
  • 7University of Geneva
  • 8Tokyo Institute of Technology

Detection of geophysical signatures associated with a geologic event, such as a volcanic eruption, is key to understanding the underlying physical processes and making an accurate hazard assessment. Magma reservoirs are the main repositories for eruptible magma, and understanding them requires the ability to detect and interpret changes in the magmatic system from surface measurements. Traditionally, monitoring for these changes has been done with seismic and geodetic approaches, both of which require dynamic ‘active’ changes within the magmatic system. Seismic monitoring relies on the number and location of earthquakes, to indicate magma migrating within the magmatic system. In contrast, geodetic efforts rely on identifying ground inflation events which have traditionally been interpreted to represent recharge of magma from a deep parental source into shallower crustal reservoirs. Neither of these techniques is sensitive to the petrology or temperature of the magma though. Thus, additional monitoring techniques able to detect ‘static’ phase changes in the evolving magma and the thermal structure of the magma reservoir are needed. The magnetotelluric method, measures subsurface electrical properties and is sensitive to both ‘magma on the move’ and these petrological changes that occur within the magma reservoir itself. Using Mount St Helens where a detailed magnetotelluric survey was completed during the most recent dome building eruptive phase 2005-06, and is now in a period of quiescence, we compare the original measurements from 2005-06 to repeated measurements in the same locations in 2022 to develop the temporal analysis approaches required for monitoring application. In addition to the repeat campaign we have deployed 4 long-term monitoring stations with continuous data observation and telemetry to local servers. First, qualitative, comparisons of the data from different time periods indicate some significant changes in subsurface conductivity. We will present an overview of the newly acquired data and the monitoring setup and discuss where the most significant changes occur.

How to cite: Hill, G., Moorkamp, M., Avram, Y., Hogg, C., Mateschke, K., Gahr, S., Schultz, A., Bowles-Martinez, E., Peacock, J., Karcioglu, G., Chen, C., Cimarelli, C., Carrichi, L., and Ogawa, Y.: Probing the 4D evolution of active magmatic systems through magnetotelluric monitoring, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-2969, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2969, 2023.