EGU23-6434, updated on 29 Apr 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-6434
EGU General Assembly 2023
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Energy and fertiliser price rises are more damaging than food export curtailment from Ukraine and Russia for food prices, health and the environment

Peter Alexander1,2, Almut Arneth3,4, Roslyn Henry5, Juliette Maire1, Sam Rabin6, and Mark Rounsevell1,3,4
Peter Alexander et al.
  • 1School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK
  • 2Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK
  • 3Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Kreuzeckbahnstr. 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
  • 4Geography & Geo-ecology, Campus Süd, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 5Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, King’s College, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK
  • 6Center for Environmental Prediction, School of Environmental & Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick NJ, USA

Higher food prices arising from restrictions on exports from Russia or Ukraine have been exacerbated by energy price rises, leading to higher costs for agricultural inputs such as fertiliser. Using a scenario approach with a global land use and food system model (LandSyMM), we quantify the potential outcomes of increasing agricultural input costs and the curtailment of exports from Russia and Ukraine on human health and the environment.  We show that, combined, agricultural inputs costs and food export restrictions could increase food costs by 60-100% from 2021 levels, potentially leading to undernourishment of 60-110 million people and annual additional deaths of 400 thousand to 1 million people if the associated dietary patterns are maintained. In additional to lower yields, reduced land use intensification arising from higher input costs would lead to agricultural land expansion of 130-349 Mha by 2030, with associated carbon and biodiversity loss. The impact of agricultural input costs on food prices is larger than that from curtailment of Russian and Ukrainian exports. Restoring food trade from Ukraine and Russia alone is therefore insufficient to avoid food insecurity problem from higher energy and fertiliser prices. While the Black Sea Grain Initiative has been a welcome development and has largely allowed Ukraine food exports to be re-established, the immediacy of these issues appears to have diverted attention away from the impacts of fertiliser prices. While fertiliser prices at the start of 2023 have come down from the peaks of mid-2022, they remain at historically high levels.  Our results suggest the costs and lower crop yields achieved through reduced fertiliser use will drive high food price inflation in 2023 and beyond. More needs to be done to break the link between higher food prices and harm to human health and the environment.  

This study demonstrates how modelling can be used to explore the complexity and interlinked nature of the globalised food system and to quantifying the trade-offs and synergies for health and environmental outcomes of difference scenarios.

How to cite: Alexander, P., Arneth, A., Henry, R., Maire, J., Rabin, S., and Rounsevell, M.: Energy and fertiliser price rises are more damaging than food export curtailment from Ukraine and Russia for food prices, health and the environment, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-6434, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-6434, 2023.